Click Here!
         
  Magic Online Trading League Bulletin Board
  Magic Discussion
  Is snapcaster mage about to be banned? (Page 2)

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | rules | memberlist | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone!
This topic is 2 pages long:   1  2 
  next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Is snapcaster mage about to be banned?
Reliquium
Member
posted January 25, 2012 12:38 AM   Click Here to See the Profile for Reliquium Click Here to Email Reliquium Send a private message to Reliquium Click to send Reliquium an Instant Message Edit/Delete Message Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Speed Demon:
Worst Idea Ever.

You're right, of course. I didn't think it through.

 
thror
Member
posted January 25, 2012 01:09 AM   Click Here to See the Profile for thror Send a private message to thror Click to send thror an Instant Message Edit/Delete Message Reply With Quote View thror's Trade Auction or SaleView thror's Trade Auction or Sale
quote:
Originally posted by broiler1977:
I think the bannings are good for the game. Just not good for the wallet when you see value plummet.

Bannings are NOT good for the game. It means wotc screwed up somewhere bigtime. We went 7 years without a banning in standard, from Affinity to Cawblade.

Where do people get this crap.

__________________
"He fights you not because you have wronged him, but because you are there."

[16:17] <@BrassMan> what do you need new tech for?
[16:18] <@BrassMan> gush is unrestricted

[19:01] <nderEvo> you can delete yourself

 
JoshSherman
Member
posted January 25, 2012 05:00 AM   Click Here to See the Profile for JoshSherman Click Here to Email JoshSherman Send a private message to JoshSherman Click to send JoshSherman an Instant MessageVisit JoshSherman's Homepage  Edit/Delete Message Reply With Quote View JoshSherman's Trade Auction or SaleView JoshSherman's Trade Auction or Sale
quote:
Originally posted by B14ckM4g3:

Pretty sure equal rights was a worse idea.

Pretty sure deadpan doesn't work on the internet.

__________________
*My LJ*Letter Bombs!*Facebook*Logout- I had it second!*CKGB

 
Vegas10
Member
posted January 25, 2012 05:18 AM   Click Here to See the Profile for Vegas10 Click Here to Email Vegas10 Send a private message to Vegas10 Click to send Vegas10 an Instant Message Edit/Delete Message Reply With Quote View Vegas10's Have/Want ListView Vegas10's Have/Want List
quote:
Originally posted by dfitzg88:
Jace, Stoneforge, and BBE were usually showing up in 7/8 top decklists in every major tournament. Snapcaster is not holding his own by that standard. He's not doing a whole lot actually.


A. I said he is right on the edge and take a wait and see
B. the last starcity open 7 of the top 8 decks played, you guessed it Snapcaster Mage, and I bet that type of trend continues.
I like Snapcaster, but he is easily the best card in standard for it's cost and generally as formats mature the cream rises and if all the cream is Snapcaster decks WOTC will look at banning him, but like I said to early to say ban him yet, but I bet he is on there watch list.

 
choco man
Member
posted January 25, 2012 08:50 AM   Click Here to See the Profile for choco man Click Here to Email choco man Send a private message to choco man Click to send choco man an Instant Message Edit/Delete Message Reply With Quote View choco man's Have/Want ListView choco man's Have/Want List
quote:
Originally posted by Vegas10:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by dfitzg88:
Jace, Stoneforge, and BBE were usually showing up in 7/8 top decklists in every major tournament. Snapcaster is not holding his own by that standard. He's not doing a whole lot actually.


A. I said he is right on the edge and take a wait and see
B. the last starcity open 7 of the top 8 decks played, you guessed it Snapcaster Mage, and I bet that type of trend continues.
I like Snapcaster, but he is easily the best card in standard for it's cost and generally as formats mature the cream rises and if all the cream is Snapcaster decks WOTC will look at banning him, but like I said to early to say ban him yet, but I bet he is on there watch list.

[/QUOTE]

Standard has cheap counter-magic on par with Counterspell (ie Mana Leak) and cheap removal on par with Swords to Plowshares (ie Vapor Snag) and cheap threats on par with Wild Nacatl (ie Delver of Secrets)......and all in the same color (ie Blue). Cheap, almost invulnerable threats in Invisible Stalker and Geist of St. Traft seal the deal.

I don't think Snapcaster Mage is holding all the strings. He's definitely the bow that wraps up the package, but he isn't on the same level as being the entire package as was BBE (no BBE, no Jund dominating, period) and Jace/SFM (an all-time standard deck).

 
broiler1977
Member
posted January 25, 2012 11:27 AM   Click Here to See the Profile for broiler1977 Click Here to Email broiler1977 Send a private message to broiler1977 Click to send broiler1977 an Instant Message Edit/Delete Message Reply With Quote View broiler1977's Have/Want ListView broiler1977's Have/Want List
quote:
Originally posted by thror:
Bannings are NOT good for the game. It means wotc screwed up somewhere bigtime. We went 7 years without a banning in standard, from Affinity to Cawblade.

Where do people get this crap.


You need bannings, because R&D aren't going to get everything right. The tool gives more than one deck idea the chance at being competitive.

As time goes by and they try to develop new deck engines, mistakingly making one to powerful in inevitable. What fun is a tournament of all the same decks? Just copy the idea, gather the cards and see if you get lucky. It ruins deckbuilding

[Edited 1 times, lastly by broiler1977 on January 25, 2012]

 
coasterdude84
Member
posted January 25, 2012 02:44 PM   Click Here to See the Profile for coasterdude84 Click Here to Email coasterdude84 Send a private message to coasterdude84 Click to send coasterdude84 an Instant Message Edit/Delete Message Reply With Quote View coasterdude84's Trade Auction or SaleView coasterdude84's Trade Auction or Sale
I don't think thror has a problem with the concept of Wizards being able to ban cards. It's more that when they need to ban something it indicates a mistake was made and a problem card exists. It means the format is somehow warped in such a way that no card in the next upcoming sets will keep the problem in check.

On the other side of the coin, however, I think they tend to be a little too quick and loose with the banhammer, at least for Legacy.

[Edited 1 times, lastly by coasterdude84 on January 25, 2012]

 
I3Iood
Member
posted January 25, 2012 02:56 PM   Click Here to See the Profile for I3Iood Click Here to Email I3Iood Send a private message to I3Iood Click to send I3Iood an Instant Message Edit/Delete Message Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by thror:
Bannings are NOT good for the game. It means wotc screwed up somewhere bigtime.

The ability to ban cards allows wizards to take chances in design. The "screwup" is because no one is perfect. I would hate for wizards to catch everything and just design the decks for you. To me, I would rather have wizards take chances and design cards good enough to be banned rather then they design all garbage cards that do not do anything.

 
Phyrexian Angel
Member
posted January 25, 2012 04:05 PM   Click Here to See the Profile for Phyrexian Angel Click Here to Email Phyrexian Angel Send a private message to Phyrexian Angel Click to send Phyrexian Angel an Instant Message Edit/Delete Message Reply With Quote 
You have to understand why a card is banned before keep asking "is xxx card going to be banned"
Usually, a card banned in standard because it makes every deck has to play it (JaceTMS) or makes a certain deck become the only option in the environment since it beats every other deck (SFM+Jace).
Delver is strong but we don't know if it is going to dominate. If it does, then we will see some cards going to be banned.
Also, we don't know the impact on DKA yet. It may change the format and gives the format more varieties.
 
Speed Demon
Banned
posted January 25, 2012 06:35 PM   Click Here to See the Profile for Speed Demon Click Here to Email Speed Demon Send a private message to Speed Demon Click to send Speed Demon an Instant Message Edit/Delete Message Reply With Quote 
In all seriousness, I would ban Delver of Secrets long before I would ban Snapcaster mage.
 
chapman24
Member
posted January 25, 2012 09:09 PM   Click Here to See the Profile for chapman24 Click Here to Email chapman24 Send a private message to chapman24 Click to send chapman24 an Instant MessageVisit chapman24's Homepage  Edit/Delete Message Reply With Quote View chapman24's Have/Want ListView chapman24's Have/Want List
They need to ban Delver in Standard, its just like wild nacatal in modern, there are no answers for a 3 power creature....or maybe people could play one of the 15 to 20 removal spells in the format....

 
-Lunch_Box-
Member
posted January 26, 2012 09:04 AM   Click Here to See the Profile for -Lunch_Box- Click Here to Email -Lunch_Box- Send a private message to -Lunch_Box- Click to send -Lunch_Box- an Instant Message Edit/Delete Message Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Speed Demon:
In all seriousness, I would ban Delver of Secrets long before I would ban Snapcaster mage.

The problem card is actually Moorland Haunt.

 
choco man
Member
posted January 26, 2012 09:15 AM   Click Here to See the Profile for choco man Click Here to Email choco man Send a private message to choco man Click to send choco man an Instant Message Edit/Delete Message Reply With Quote View choco man's Have/Want ListView choco man's Have/Want List
quote:
Originally posted by -Lunch_Box-:
The problem card is actually Moorland Haunt.

The problem card is that there are no other problem cards in other colors.

 
Bugger
Member
posted January 26, 2012 09:44 AM   Click Here to See the Profile for Bugger Click Here to Email Bugger Send a private message to Bugger Click to send Bugger an Instant Message Edit/Delete Message Reply With Quote 
I would be sorely disappointed in Wizards if they banned Snapcaster, because it doesn't need banning. Comparisons to JtMS seem lopsided at best. Jace was a repeated Unsummon, a repeated Brainstorm, and a ticking time bomb wincon, all at once and for nothing beyond an initial investment of four mana. Furthermore, he existed in a format with practically no answers (and virtually no playable ones), and could further protect himself and maintain a stable board by screwing the most fundamental equalizing variable in the game: your topdecks. Against all that, Snapcaster is 'merely' a second use out of the best spell you've drawn so far, plus a 2/1. That's fantastic, don't get me wrong, but it's nowhere near Jace's level.

If we accept that JtMS is the measurement against which all potential standard bannings will be judged (as Ravager was before him), Snapcaster comes up short.

__________________
It is a known fact that more Americans watch the television than any other appliance.

 
broiler1977
Member
posted January 26, 2012 11:33 AM   Click Here to See the Profile for broiler1977 Click Here to Email broiler1977 Send a private message to broiler1977 Click to send broiler1977 an Instant Message Edit/Delete Message Reply With Quote View broiler1977's Have/Want ListView broiler1977's Have/Want List
I'm sorry about the title of the post. I was just wondering because I saw a playset for sale that was way under what I thought they were worth and wanted to make sure.
 
B14ckM4g3
Member
posted January 26, 2012 02:21 PM   Click Here to See the Profile for B14ckM4g3 Click Here to Email B14ckM4g3 Send a private message to B14ckM4g3 Click to send B14ckM4g3 an Instant Message Edit/Delete Message Reply With Quote 
simple answer: No.

No explanation is needed. He won't be banned. Simple as that.

 
Havoc Demon
Member
posted January 26, 2012 02:46 PM   Click Here to See the Profile for Havoc Demon Click Here to Email Havoc Demon Send a private message to Havoc Demon Click to send Havoc Demon an Instant MessageVisit Havoc Demon's Homepage  Edit/Delete Message Reply With Quote 
I would like to see how the meta changes before swinging the hammer. They did just print a very open-ended sideboard option which may or may not slow Snapcaster down a bit.

__________________
Most References in Massachusetts
80th All-time

Support my friend's store: http://www.tabletoparena.com

My blog:
http://wings0298.blogspot.com

 

This topic is 2 pages long:   1  2 

All times are PDT (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | MOTL Home Page | Privacy Statement & TOS

© 1996-2012 Magic Online Trading League

Powered by Infopop © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47e