Author
|
Topic: With D&T potentially played less b/c catching TNN hate,whats going on w/Rishadan Port
|
LandDestroyer Member
|
posted February 25, 2014 09:39 AM
  
http://magic.tcgplayer.com/db/magic_single_card.asp?cn=Rishadan+PortRishadan Port has consistently had a mean price of under $40. Then someone did a buy out of all the rishadan ports online from what I understand [annoyed] speculating D&T would get more popular - which it did. That explains the spike around May 7th to a degree. Then the price held steady until around December 21st when it started rising, despite that being the spike of when death & taxes was doing well. It started doing worse as more people played TNN or decks that have a way to deal with TNN (zealous persecution, supreme verdict, engineered plague, liliana, more combo, etc). It kept climbing and then exploded around February 8th having what I think it the cards largest increase in mean price ever. What's going on, where is this going? I'm fortunate that when I got back into mtg about 11 months ago I bought 3 of these for under $30 each, then in October traded what I felt was a lot for a 4th...but now jeez. Edit: Adding an article I'm about to read: http://blog.mtgprice.com/2014/02/17/sticker-shock-higher-prices-but-will-they-stay/
[Edited 1 times, lastly by LandDestroyer on February 25, 2014]
 |
mini1337s Member
|
posted February 25, 2014 09:48 AM
  
Lands is currently seen as a viable option in Legacy at the moment (Dark Depths/Thespian Stage versions). It runs Port as a 4 of as well.
|
AGO Member
|
posted February 25, 2014 10:48 AM
  
Everybody wants to play the hottest deck. People are buying at this price. Magic is growing at such a rampant rate the amount of cards that we currently have cannot sustain the need for the general public so prices rise due to that. Port was just waiting in the shadows for its moment to shine.
|
James_Hetfield2 Member
|
posted February 25, 2014 01:35 PM

Its an old card, that has avoided a reprint so far.Sees play in good legacy decks (D&T, Lands, Goblins, etc.), casual card, even see it in Vintage occasionally. Highly unlikely to ever see a similar or better card in the future.
|
JayC Member
|
posted February 25, 2014 02:54 PM

quote: Originally posted by AGO: Everybody wants to play the hottest deck. People are buying at this price. Magic is growing at such a rampant rate the amount of cards that we currently have cannot sustain the need for the general public so prices rise due to that. Port was just waiting in the shadows for its moment to shine.
This.
|
LandDestroyer Member
|
posted February 25, 2014 02:55 PM
  
So, how do you seeing this trending moving forward with it so high now ($129.99 on scg - nm sold out)?
|
yodadoc1234 Member
|
posted February 25, 2014 05:14 PM
  
I see it as a bubble is about to burst. While I enjoy a lot of my cards increasing in value; I do not enjoy the aspect that others can't enjoy or get into the game at the modern or legacy level. Playing the game for me is about fifty percent of the fun; trading is the other fifty percent.However, when prices get so out of whack- and Port is the perfect example- it really ruins the game in a lot of ways.People are supposed to have fun trading,playing and socializing in this game- not wondering how much of their paycheck they will need to buy one playset of cards. I'm not saying the cards can't have value;they have to if the game is to survive. However, something has to give eventually, prices or players. I am leaning towards the loss of players.
|
AGO Member
|
posted February 25, 2014 06:17 PM
  
quote: Originally posted by yodadoc1234: I see it as a bubble is about to burst. While I enjoy a lot of my cards increasing in value; I do not enjoy the aspect that others can't enjoy or get into the game at the modern or legacy level. Playing the game for me is about fifty percent of the fun; trading is the other fifty percent.However, when prices get so out of whack- and Port is the perfect example- it really ruins the game in a lot of ways.People are supposed to have fun trading,playing and socializing in this game- not wondering how much of their paycheck they will need to buy one playset of cards. I'm not saying the cards can't have value;they have to if the game is to survive. However, something has to give eventually, prices or players. I am leaning towards the loss of players.
Here is where you show you have no idea what your talking about. I have fun trading, buying and selling. Sorry the game can't live up to your standard of "fun". When a player sells out someone is going to step in and take his place. Nothing has to give. Its the ebb and tide of the game. Standard helps bring in the money for WOTC. With a constantly rotating format they have nothing to worry about. People will be there to buy the product. This game has been dying for over 20 years. THE SKY IS FALLING HOW LONG CAN IT LAST.
 |
jbark Member
|
posted February 25, 2014 06:45 PM
  
Seems Yoda has little funds to play with big boy cards... he keeps complaining on many threads about prices. With popularity goes demand and with demand goes value and with value goes cost. With a limited supply on some cards this is expected. Take it like this. Just at the PT there were snapcasters in ~60% of the possible 32 card slots in the top 8. Just imagine how many people will run the same or similar decks. The same thing happened to legacy lands. People want to play it and need cards. Dealers don't have said cards and thus have to buy. If they buy high they sell high. And once they cannot buy at that price they raise it and sell higher. Its been covered. Stop blaming SCG, TCG, eBay, ABU... its the players that you should blame for high prices.
|
yodadoc1234 Member
|
posted February 25, 2014 07:38 PM
  
Wow! I didn't know having a reasonable opinion would be attacked on here.
|
yodadoc1234 Member
|
posted February 25, 2014 07:46 PM
  
You guys really love hyperbole. The game cannot sustain the drastic increases forever.
|
thror Member
|
posted February 25, 2014 07:51 PM

quote: Originally posted by yodadoc1234: You guys really love hyperbole. The game cannot sustain the drastic increases forever.
'the game' doesnt not just mean eternal. mtg is more popular now than ever. having expensive eternal staples is fine, as long as wotc also supports other formats. Modern, Standard, and Limited are also the only things that directly make wotc money, and are doing REALLY WELL right now. you should open your eyes. __________________ "He fights you not because you have wronged him, but because you are there."<@Anusien> Pretty sure New Zealanders are the sheep shaggers <KIP_NZ> Anusien: I'm a kiwi and I've shagged a sheep <KIP_NZ> we kiwi's like our sheep
|
chaos021 Member
|
posted February 25, 2014 07:57 PM
  
quote: Originally posted by jbark: Stop blaming SCG, TCG, eBay, ABU... its the players that you should blame for high prices.
Or lack of creativity/card pools. __________________ "Message to women worldwide: Girls....we're stupid. We don't like games. We don't know games. We can't read minds. Say it like you mean or STFU." -rockondonMy Sale Thread
|
paragondave Member
|
posted February 25, 2014 08:59 PM
  
quote: Originally posted by yodadoc1234: You guys really love hyperbole. yodadoc1234 cannot sustain the drastic increases forever.
fixed.
|
Godswill Member
|
posted February 25, 2014 09:37 PM
  
quote: Originally posted by yodadoc1234: People are supposed to have fun trading,playing and socializing in this game- not wondering how much of their paycheck they will need to buy one playset of cards.
Then they should probably be focusing on their career rather than MtG if they can't afford the cards they want. Here's something interesting to think about- as the game grows older and more expensive (for the older formats) the players also grow older. Most people start off playing the game as kids, but as they grow older, they will have jobs/careers that allows them to sustain a higher level of spending on Magic. Thus, the death of a format due to prices won't be as quick as you might think. For the most part as spending power increases, your willingness to deal with high prices also increases.
|
chaos021 Member
|
posted February 25, 2014 09:57 PM
  
quote: Originally posted by Godswill: Then they should probably be focusing on their career rather than MtG if they can't afford the cards they want. Here's something interesting to think about- as the game grows older and more expensive (for the older formats) the players also grow older. Most people start off playing the game as kids, but as they grow older, they will have jobs/careers that allows them to sustain a higher level of spending on Magic. Thus, the death of a format due to prices won't be as quick as you might think. For the most part as spending power increases, your willingness to deal with high prices also increases.
LOL. What? I get where you're going, but what you're saying is bull****. __________________ "Message to women worldwide: Girls....we're stupid. We don't like games. We don't know games. We can't read minds. Say it like you mean or STFU." -rockondonMy Sale Thread
|
daner Member
|
posted February 25, 2014 10:11 PM

quote: Originally posted by Godswill:
Here's something interesting to think about- as the game grows older and more expensive (for the older formats) the players also grow older. Most people start off playing the game as kids, but as they grow older, they will have jobs/careers that allows them to sustain a higher level of spending on Magic. Thus, the death of a format due to prices won't be as quick as you might think. For the most part as spending power increases, your willingness to deal with high prices also increases.
Like stated above, I understand where you are going, but this is spewing pure garbage. Just because I make more money, or get older and thus get a better job, does NOT mean I nor anyone else is willing to fork over more money.
Just to poke a hole in that argument...you didn't factor in marriage, mortgage, kids, etc etc etc....You might make more in your 40's than you do in your 20's...but your bills might be a hell of a lot higher, too. Simply..."I make more money so I can afford to pay higher prices" is not a good argument.
 |
Bruised Member
|
posted February 25, 2014 10:18 PM
  
quote: Originally posted by daner: Like stated above, I understand where you are going, but this is spewing pure garbage. Just because I make more money, or get older and thus get a better job, does NOT mean I nor anyone else is willing to fork over more money.
Just to poke a hole in that argument...you didn't factor in marriage, mortgage, kids, etc etc etc....You might make more in your 40's than you do in your 20's...but your bills might be a hell of a lot higher, too. Simply..."I make more money so I can afford to pay higher prices" is not a good argument.
Agree completely, not suddenly seeing a sudden surge in vintage GPs due to all the high rolling magic players. The price increases are normal mtg price increases, a constructed non standard price increase always happens during ptq season and we always have one legacy rising star after the legacy GP. The sky is not falling this is how magic card prices act. Be smart realize that the wizard supported format will eventually see reprints of at least the zen fetchlands offload at the peak and move on, the real question is if there will be another modern ptq season before that happens (which there almost certainly will be).
 |
Godswill Member
|
posted February 25, 2014 10:28 PM
  
quote: Originally posted by daner: Like stated above, I understand where you are going, but this is spewing pure garbage. Just because I make more money, or get older and thus get a better job, does NOT mean I nor anyone else is willing to fork over more money.
Just to poke a hole in that argument...you didn't factor in marriage, mortgage, kids, etc etc etc....You might make more in your 40's than you do in your 20's...but your bills might be a hell of a lot higher, too. Simply..."I make more money so I can afford to pay higher prices" is not a good argument.
I'll try to put this in economic terms then. Let's assume Magic is a normal good, you'll buy more as your income increases. If you're not an idiot, then chances are your income increases at a higher rate than card prices increase. Yes, there will be substitution effects that prevent you from buying as many Magic cards as you would without price increases, BUT given an higher income, you CAN and probably WILL buy more cards because it increases your overall happiness (i.e. utility). I am of course assuming here that the income effect is in total greater than the substitution effect, but I think it's a safe assumption unless you have absolutely NO earning power. Sure kids and mortgage will lower your effective income, but marriage should effectively INCREASE your income. How does it make any sense that you lose income by getting married?
 |
chaos021 Member
|
posted February 25, 2014 11:06 PM
  
quote: Originally posted by Godswill: Sure kids and mortgage will lower your effective income, but marriage should effectively INCREASE your income. How does it make any sense that you lose income by getting married?
You're still missing the point. Let's say I make more money when I do get married. That doesn't necessarily change my willingness to drop $100s on Polluted Deltas, dual lands or whatever happens to be hot right now. For instance, just because I can buy a Playstation 4 doesn't mean I will. BTW, you made a huge supposition in your attempt to relate to economic terms. __________________ "Message to women worldwide: Girls....we're stupid. We don't like games. We don't know games. We can't read minds. Say it like you mean or STFU." -rockondonMy Sale Thread
|
jbark Member
|
posted February 26, 2014 02:54 AM
  
Seems Yoda has little funds to play with big boy cards... he keeps complaining on many threads about prices. With popularity goes demand and with demand goes value and with value goes cost. With a limited supply on some cards this is expected. Take it like this. Just at the PT there were snapcasters in ~60% of the possible 32 card slots in the top 8. Just imagine how many people will run the same or similar decks. The same thing happened to legacy lands. People want to play it and need cards. Dealers don't have said cards and thus have to buy. If they buy high they sell high. And once they cannot buy at that price they raise it and sell higher. Its been covered. Stop blaming SCG, TCG, eBay, ABU... its the players that you should blame for high prices.
|
LandDestroyer Member
|
posted February 26, 2014 07:26 AM
  
Grr. The point of this post wasn't for you guys to bicker about who's priorities are right at different points in your life. I feel like we used to have more civil discussion on MOTL a decade ago.So basically most of you expect the price to keep going up, but nobody has indicated how quickly. I think it's interesting how big of a jump legacy staples have been making over the last year. I personally think Port will stay around its current price point b/c I don't expect D&T to get more popular than it was before TNN was printed UNLESS Brimaz and Spirit make an impact that gets through the Zealous Persecution hate etc right now. I could be wrong. A little note in reference to some of the comments I'm seeing. Just because your income increases doesn't mean you are willing to spend more on Magic. When I first joined this site I was in college and used all my extra money to get into this game buying Moxen, Lotus, etc. Now I make EDIT *enough* a year and am about to be engaged to a doctor yet I refuse to play Elves in legacy b/c I refuse to spend the going rate on a set Gaea's cradles. As you make more money, your priorities and expenses go up. I have a mortgage, a car, I'll have to pay for a wedding, I am trying to increase savings. One thing you didn't state is that usually as ADULTs make more money they increase their contributions to 401k, Roth IRA by a corresponding amount/increase. Also, your wife may be ok with you spending money on your hobby with your combined income...but don't assume when you get married you're suddenly making more money and will spend your wife's money on your hobby. She should have hobbys too. You don't sound like you're in a successful marriage (guessing never been married). That all being said, there are enough players who do have money and are willing to spend it on magic that it drives up these prices. Some of it is partially due to people manipulating prices...but that only works if there are buyers. Does it screw over people who don't want to drop their entire paycheck on cardboard? Yes! Does anyone care? Not really. I mean, I care, but I don't matter. Same as you. Until WOTC gets rid of the reserved list this will persist. If they don't, eventually only the richest magic players will play [sanctioned] legacy like vintage. That's not SCG's fault (though they do get on my nerves), that's WOTC's fault...and the fault of people using magic as an investment vehicle and doing massive speculative buyouts to drive up the price.
[Edited 1 times, lastly by LandDestroyer on February 27, 2014]
 |
James_Hetfield2 Member
|
posted February 26, 2014 07:29 AM

Yeah I don't expect regular versions to go up too much more.Its not on the Reserved list either, cmon reprint of some kind 
|
LandDestroyer Member
|
posted February 26, 2014 07:39 AM
  
quote: Originally posted by James_Hetfield2: Yeah I don't expect regular versions to go up too much more.Its not on the Reserved list either, cmon reprint of some kind 
Ya, my comment was in general for legacy. Ya, I was thinking about that last night wondering when they'll reprint it. Unfortunately I've picked up most of the legacy/modern cards I'd want that aren't on the reserved list so reprints won't do me any good.
|
chaos021 Member
|
posted February 26, 2014 12:17 PM
  
Even with Death and Taxes getting popular again, I never expected it to go far beyond $60. I was trying to trade or sell mine when it hit this point. At this point, with it costing more than some dual lands, I think a lot of people will look at other decks that do well against it. I just can't imagine people trading for Rishadan Port at this price level.
| |