Click Here!
         
  Magic Online Trading League Bulletin Board
  Magic Discussion
  Missing Packages

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | rules | memberlist | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone!   next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Missing Packages
ninjazwig
Member
posted August 12, 2011 11:49 AM   Click Here to See the Profile for ninjazwig Click Here to Email ninjazwig Send a private message to ninjazwig Click to send ninjazwig an Instant Message Edit/Delete Message Reply With Quote View ninjazwig's Have/Want ListView ninjazwig's Have/Want List
I have been in a trade with a user on here for a long while now. The package he sent was registered but came up missing. He had the postal service run a trace on it and they concluded that it is indeed lost. They refunded him a total of about 48 dollars, however the declared value of the package was over 300 dollars. I thought the point of registered mail was to protect against these kinds of things and to keep you from being out money in this kind of case. Has anyone else dealt with this before? I feel bad that he is out money but as of right now I have been out cards for nearly 5 months. He has been nothing but helpful so I am not upset in the least with the trader. Just curious as to how this all gets resolved.
 
majicman
Member
posted August 12, 2011 11:59 AM   Click Here to See the Profile for majicman Click Here to Email majicman Send a private message to majicman Click to send majicman an Instant Message Edit/Delete Message Reply With Quote View majicman's Have/Want ListView majicman's Have/Want List
It sounds like this was an International transaction and registered mail (at least from the states) when shipped internationally has a cap of around $48.

Unfortunately, the only way to get around this cap is to ship as Express Mail (which usually starts in the $20 dollar range with insurance added for each $100 past the first $100 with actual insured/declared value). So in this specific case they would get the entire funds back if they show proof of the value of cards shipped. I am not sure on the procedure for proof, but you can always talk with your shipping agent (USPS generally). The other situation is if you use Federal Express or UPS. They have their own insurance and you pay for that just like Express Mail, but USPS has never lost any of my Express Mail shipping items.

I am sure others out here have had different experiences.

If over a few hundred bucks I am not willing to take to many chances and usually like to ship express mail to cover. Expensive to ship, but you are a bit more protected from a substantial loss.

I have taken a few chances, but usually registered is fairly secure.

Good luck...Greg

 
Bagbokk
Member
posted August 12, 2011 12:07 PM   Click Here to See the Profile for Bagbokk Click Here to Email Bagbokk Send a private message to Bagbokk Click to send Bagbokk an Instant MessageVisit Bagbokk's Homepage  Edit/Delete Message Reply With Quote 
[wrong and misleading info!]

[Edited 1 times, lastly by Bagbokk on August 12, 2011]
 
MasterWolf
Member
posted August 12, 2011 12:12 PM   Click Here to See the Profile for MasterWolf Click Here to Email MasterWolf Send a private message to MasterWolf Click to send MasterWolf an Instant MessageVisit MasterWolf's Homepage  Edit/Delete Message Reply With Quote View MasterWolf's Have/Want ListView MasterWolf's Have/Want List
quote:
Originally posted by Bagbokk:
I'm not sure how the rules would cover it so I'll wait for a mod to answer that.

But personally, something like this sucks for everyone, and I would probably just ask to split the loss with the other guy and chalk this up to risk of doing business online. A really nice guy might accept, but it's also likely that he'll refuse because he did uphold his end of the deal when he sent registered.


Clearly you are not a mod His end of the deal is receipt of his cards by the 2nd party, not proof of shipping. So you have it the other way around. Ninja, if he's a nice guy, might accept to split the loss.

 
ninjazwig
Member
posted August 12, 2011 12:21 PM   Click Here to See the Profile for ninjazwig Click Here to Email ninjazwig Send a private message to ninjazwig Click to send ninjazwig an Instant Message Edit/Delete Message Reply With Quote View ninjazwig's Have/Want ListView ninjazwig's Have/Want List
Thanks for the quick replies. This was indeed international from Canada to the US. It bums me out that he is just out this part of the deal, I'm probably going to work out some kind of smaller deal to help soften his loss (our loss now I guess).
 
Bagbokk
Member
posted August 12, 2011 12:22 PM   Click Here to See the Profile for Bagbokk Click Here to Email Bagbokk Send a private message to Bagbokk Click to send Bagbokk an Instant MessageVisit Bagbokk's Homepage  Edit/Delete Message Reply With Quote 
quote:
Clearly you are not a mod His end of the deal is receipt of his cards by the 2nd party, not proof of shipping. So you have it the other way around. Ninja, if he's a nice guy, might accept to split the loss.

I guess you're right, actually. I don't really memorize the rules and generally understand them more by their spirit than the letter. So what makes the application of the rule to this specific situation harder to remember is that it just seems illogical that someone can send registered and still be held accountable for its loss in the mail.

So, feel free to ignore my earlier post!

[Edited 1 times, lastly by Bagbokk on August 12, 2011]

 
gaeacradle
Member
posted August 12, 2011 01:53 PM   Click Here to See the Profile for gaeacradle Click Here to Email gaeacradle Send a private message to gaeacradle Click to send gaeacradle an Instant Message Edit/Delete Message Reply With Quote View gaeacradle's Have/Want ListView gaeacradle's Have/Want List
Yeah, if the guy is really nice and someone that you want to continue dealing with in the future, I would probably offer to eat some of the loss too. Maybe not 50% since $125 is a lot of money. Perhaps like $75 to 100.
 
majicman
Member
posted August 12, 2011 05:03 PM   Click Here to See the Profile for majicman Click Here to Email majicman Send a private message to majicman Click to send majicman an Instant Message Edit/Delete Message Reply With Quote View majicman's Have/Want ListView majicman's Have/Want List
quote:
Originally posted by Bagbokk:
[wrong and misleading info!]

What I was trying to convey is for larger trades/sales, it may be "better" to get some insurance on shipping, especially international. Registered mail has the cap. and this protects both parties.

I understand folks are trying to avoid BTA's and trying to have a fair spread of loss between a transaction. I am just trying to suggest for certain "tolerance levels" shipping with insurance / Express mail may be a better way to go even though it is at a much higher cost.

$300 bucks of cards is a lot to risk, imho for anyone (except if you are made of money ).

I humbly apologize if you thought I was trying to provide misinformation.

Regards...Greg

 
Bagbokk
Member
posted August 12, 2011 05:13 PM   Click Here to See the Profile for Bagbokk Click Here to Email Bagbokk Send a private message to Bagbokk Click to send Bagbokk an Instant MessageVisit Bagbokk's Homepage  Edit/Delete Message Reply With Quote 
Not you. My first post included some bad info that MasterWolf corrected, so I edited it so that people wouldn't read it and get the wrong idea.
 
nderdog
Moderator
posted August 13, 2011 07:19 AM   Click Here to See the Profile for nderdog Click Here to Email nderdog Send a private message to nderdog Click to send nderdog an Instant MessageVisit nderdog's Homepage  Edit/Delete Message Reply With Quote View nderdog's Have/Want ListView nderdog's Have/Want List
quote:
Originally posted by Bagbokk:
So what makes the application of the rule to this specific situation harder to remember is that it just seems illogical that someone can send registered and still be held accountable for its loss in the mail.

Is that really more illogical than making the person who was supposed to receive the package eat the loss for the post office losing a package? Either way, someone is going to have to suffer the loss of a registered package. Only the sender can buy insurance and actually protect themselves in case of loss, though.

__________________
There's no need to fear, UNDERDOG is here!

All your Gruul Nodorogs are belong to me. Trade them to me, please!

Report rules violations.

Remember the Auctions Board!

Bruised
Member
posted August 13, 2011 09:57 AM   Click Here to See the Profile for Bruised Click Here to Email Bruised Send a private message to Bruised Click to send Bruised an Instant Message Edit/Delete Message Reply With Quote View Bruised's Have/Want ListView Bruised's Have/Want List
Yeah I ended up splitting the cost of 14 fbb duals about a year and a half ago as they got lost from austria to the US, still stings a bit when half of 14 fbb duals was $300 but it sucks when that happens and all you can do is be a good sport and eat $300 bucks.
 
Harmless
Member
posted August 13, 2011 10:37 AM   Click Here to See the Profile for Harmless Click Here to Email Harmless Send a private message to Harmless Click to send Harmless an Instant Message Edit/Delete Message Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by nderdog:
Is that really more illogical than making the person who was supposed to receive the package eat the loss for the post office losing a package? Either way, someone is going to have to suffer the loss of a registered package. Only the sender can buy insurance and actually protect themselves in case of loss, though.


Well, the buyer can request and pay for insurance, but they don't need to because they know it's all on the seller if something goes wrong. Buyers all want the cheapest shipping and sellers all want to be protected, but the bottom line is that buyers don't want to pay for something that they often get for free. I think if the seller can provide tracking then the loss should be split in the event of lost mail. I guess it's just a buyer's market.

 
Bagbokk
Member
posted August 13, 2011 11:12 AM   Click Here to See the Profile for Bagbokk Click Here to Email Bagbokk Send a private message to Bagbokk Click to send Bagbokk an Instant MessageVisit Bagbokk's Homepage  Edit/Delete Message Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by nderdog:
Is that really more illogical than making the person who was supposed to receive the package eat the loss for the post office losing a package? Either way, someone is going to have to suffer the loss of a registered package. Only the sender can buy insurance and actually protect themselves in case of loss, though.

Yes actually, it is, but we're obviously on opposite sides of what is reasonable regarding risk of loss with sending, so we're never going to agree, which is perfectly fine.

Regardless, I simply got the application of the rule wrong, and the rules are what they are. Looks like I'm going to have to ask everyone to state I'm not responsible for lost or stolen mail even when I send registered.

[Edited 1 times, lastly by Bagbokk on August 13, 2011]

 
majicman
Member
posted August 13, 2011 01:22 PM   Click Here to See the Profile for majicman Click Here to Email majicman Send a private message to majicman Click to send majicman an Instant Message Edit/Delete Message Reply With Quote View majicman's Have/Want ListView majicman's Have/Want List
quote:
Originally posted by Bagbokk:
Not you. My first post included some bad info that MasterWolf corrected, so I edited it so that people wouldn't read it and get the wrong idea.

Ok. We are good bagbokk. Sorry for the misunderstanding. Hope things work out for everyone on these types of transactions. Dang post office....Greg

 

All times are PDT (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | MOTL Home Page | Privacy Statement & TOS

© 1996-2012 Magic Online Trading League

Powered by Infopop © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47e