|
Author
|
Topic: with new legend rule,will gaea's crandle be banned?
|
WeedIan
Member
|
posted June 26, 2013 04:50 AM
         
Legandary Tri Lands that don't come into play tapped with land types.Not busted at all! __________________
Member Since 03/28/2001
12000+ posts
1st in posts in Ontario and Canada
9th in posts on MOTL
5th in Refs in Ontario
Pushing to get to top 100 in MOTL Refs
|
Pail42
Member
|
posted June 26, 2013 12:24 PM
quote:
Originally posted by choco man:
In standard, it would be strictly better than basic land since there's essentially nothing in the format that punishes a greedy manabase. It's also a much more blatant case of "lazy design" that was bashed in the BOP thread.
You still can't have more than one in play. That's a pretty significant drawback I wouldn't necessarily call lazy but is something very obvious they could try. It worked out okay for the bonus-ability lands from Kamigawa (Minamo, etc) that tended to get splashed into the mix because they came in handy from time to time.
|
Volcanon
Member
|
posted June 26, 2013 02:11 PM
quote:
Originally posted by Pail42:
You still can't have more than one in play. That's a pretty significant drawback I wouldn't necessarily call lazy but is something very obvious they could try.It worked out okay for the bonus-ability lands from Kamigawa (Minamo, etc) that tended to get splashed into the mix because they came in handy from time to time.
I once almost lost to the legendary landwalk guy in Kamigawa because I had Shizo. That was funny-ish. The format really needs at least some non-basic hate. like a 2/1 CITP kill a non-basic dude for 2R or something.
|
WeedIan
Member
|
posted June 26, 2013 02:25 PM
quote:
Originally posted by Volcanon:
I once almost lost to the legendary landwalk guy in Kamigawa because I had Shizo. That was funny-ish.The format really needs at least some non-basic hate. like a 2/1 CITP kill a non-basic dude for 2R or something.
They should print a Price of Progress that costs 3R or 2RR __________________
Member Since 03/28/2001
12000+ posts
1st in posts in Ontario and Canada
9th in posts on MOTL
5th in Refs in Ontario
Pushing to get to top 100 in MOTL Refs
|
Havoc Demon
Member
|
posted June 26, 2013 09:36 PM
Bringing back Price of Progress back would be hilarious and terrible at the same time. Can't even bring back something like Anathemancer likely until Restoration Angel rotates. __________________
Blog:
http://wings0298.blogspot.com/
Scans:http://s1199.photobucket.com/user/Wings0298/library/?sort=3&page=1
|
revenger
Member
|
posted June 26, 2013 10:31 PM
quote:
Originally posted by WeedIan:
They should print a Price of Progress that costs 3R or 2RR
M14 has spoiled Burning Earth, some nonbasic hate. Ironically cc is 3R. __________________
27th in refs on Motl! #1 Ref's for Arizona! I offer 3rd party trading services. Email if interested. Your 2008, 2010 & 2012 Siskel & Ebert award winner! Your Motl runner-up in My Cousin Vinny & Rolling Stone Award! MTGO Clan
|
WeedIan
Member
|
posted June 27, 2013 05:34 AM
quote:
Originally posted by revenger:
M14 has spoiled Burning Earth, some nonbasic hate. Ironically cc is 3R.
Looking at that card makes me think a "fixed" Price of Progress would cost about 5R at a minimum __________________
Member Since 03/28/2001
12000+ posts
1st in posts in Ontario and Canada
9th in posts on MOTL
5th in Refs in Ontario
Pushing to get to top 100 in MOTL Refs
|
daner
Member
|
posted June 27, 2013 06:08 AM
Ruination reprint would be cute. Straight up one-sided Armgeddon in the Red based aggro deck for the most part.
|
choco man
Member
|
posted June 27, 2013 06:56 AM
quote:
Originally posted by revenger:
M14 has spoiled Burning Earth, some nonbasic hate. Ironically cc is 3R.
Makes me miss Price of Progress so much. Has MTG changed so much that we can't have more than one playable burn spell at one time in standard?
|
Hyroko
New Member
|
posted June 27, 2013 04:59 PM
You DO realise this is infinite mana with any of the "counting" lands and a crucible right?
crucible only costs 3 also, so that makes it stupid easy.
|
Volcanon
Member
|
posted June 27, 2013 05:27 PM
quote:
Originally posted by choco man:
Makes me miss Price of Progress so much. Has MTG changed so much that we can't have more than one playable burn spell at one time in standard?
For the longest time the burn in standard was Hammer and shock. We actually have it better than most of the time.
|
JoshSherman
Member
|
posted June 27, 2013 05:46 PM
quote:
Originally posted by Hyroko:
You DO realise this is infinite mana with any of the "counting" lands and a crucible right?
crucible only costs 3 also, so that makes it stupid easy.
What? How do you intend to play any of them an infinite number of times in a turn? __________________
*My LJ*Letter Bombs!*FB*Logout- MM is a copycat! (So am I)*CKGB
|
choco man
Member
|
posted June 28, 2013 12:31 AM
quote:
Originally posted by Volcanon:
For the longest time the burn in standard was Hammer and shock. We actually have it better than most of the time.
Burn was insanely deadly in the time of Hammer of Bogardan and Shock.
|
mm1983
Member
|
posted July 01, 2013 08:50 AM
quote:
Originally posted by WeedIan:
Looking at that card makes me think a "fixed" Price of Progress would cost about 5R at a minimum
I think they could do that at the 5R cost in the form of a creature. 2/2 when it enters the battlefield each player takes 2 damage for each non basic land he or she controls or else 4R for a 1/1 that does 1 damage for each non basic land.
|
Magic Online Trading League Bulletin Board
UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! 
