Author
|
Topic: with new legend rule,will gaea's crandle be banned?
|
WeedIan Member
|
posted June 26, 2013 04:50 AM
![Click to send WeedIan an Instant Message](http://classic.magictraders.com/ubb/im.gif) ![](http://classic.magictraders.com/ubb/div.gif) ![View WeedIan's Have/Want List](http://classic.magictraders.com/ubb/icon1.gif)
Legandary Tri Lands that don't come into play tapped with land types.Not busted at all! __________________ Member Since 03/28/2001 12000+ posts 1st in posts in Ontario and Canada 9th in posts on MOTL 5th in Refs in Ontario Pushing to get to top 100 in MOTL Refs
|
Pail42 Member
|
posted June 26, 2013 12:24 PM
![Click to send Pail42 an Instant Message](http://classic.magictraders.com/ubb/im.gif)
quote: Originally posted by choco man: In standard, it would be strictly better than basic land since there's essentially nothing in the format that punishes a greedy manabase. It's also a much more blatant case of "lazy design" that was bashed in the BOP thread.
You still can't have more than one in play. That's a pretty significant drawback I wouldn't necessarily call lazy but is something very obvious they could try. It worked out okay for the bonus-ability lands from Kamigawa (Minamo, etc) that tended to get splashed into the mix because they came in handy from time to time.
|
Volcanon Member
|
posted June 26, 2013 02:11 PM
![Click to send Volcanon an Instant Message](http://classic.magictraders.com/ubb/im.gif)
quote: Originally posted by Pail42: You still can't have more than one in play. That's a pretty significant drawback I wouldn't necessarily call lazy but is something very obvious they could try.It worked out okay for the bonus-ability lands from Kamigawa (Minamo, etc) that tended to get splashed into the mix because they came in handy from time to time.
I once almost lost to the legendary landwalk guy in Kamigawa because I had Shizo. That was funny-ish. The format really needs at least some non-basic hate. like a 2/1 CITP kill a non-basic dude for 2R or something.
|
WeedIan Member
|
posted June 26, 2013 02:25 PM
![Click to send WeedIan an Instant Message](http://classic.magictraders.com/ubb/im.gif) ![](http://classic.magictraders.com/ubb/div.gif) ![View WeedIan's Have/Want List](http://classic.magictraders.com/ubb/icon1.gif)
quote: Originally posted by Volcanon: I once almost lost to the legendary landwalk guy in Kamigawa because I had Shizo. That was funny-ish.The format really needs at least some non-basic hate. like a 2/1 CITP kill a non-basic dude for 2R or something.
They should print a Price of Progress that costs 3R or 2RR __________________ Member Since 03/28/2001 12000+ posts 1st in posts in Ontario and Canada 9th in posts on MOTL 5th in Refs in Ontario Pushing to get to top 100 in MOTL Refs
|
Havoc Demon Member
|
posted June 26, 2013 09:36 PM
![Click to send Havoc Demon an Instant Message](http://classic.magictraders.com/ubb/im.gif) ![](http://classic.magictraders.com/ubb/div.gif) ![View Havoc Demon's Trade Auction or Sale](http://classic.magictraders.com/ubb/icon1.gif)
Bringing back Price of Progress back would be hilarious and terrible at the same time. Can't even bring back something like Anathemancer likely until Restoration Angel rotates. __________________ Blog: http://wings0298.blogspot.com/ Scans:http://s1199.photobucket.com/user/Wings0298/library/?sort=3&page=1
|
revenger Member
|
posted June 26, 2013 10:31 PM
![Click to send revenger an Instant Message](http://classic.magictraders.com/ubb/im.gif)
quote: Originally posted by WeedIan: They should print a Price of Progress that costs 3R or 2RR
M14 has spoiled Burning Earth, some nonbasic hate. Ironically cc is 3R. __________________ 27th in refs on Motl! #1 Ref's for Arizona! I offer 3rd party trading services. Email if interested. Your 2008, 2010 & 2012 Siskel & Ebert award winner! Your Motl runner-up in My Cousin Vinny & Rolling Stone Award! MTGO Clan
|
WeedIan Member
|
posted June 27, 2013 05:34 AM
![Click to send WeedIan an Instant Message](http://classic.magictraders.com/ubb/im.gif) ![](http://classic.magictraders.com/ubb/div.gif) ![View WeedIan's Have/Want List](http://classic.magictraders.com/ubb/icon1.gif)
quote: Originally posted by revenger: M14 has spoiled Burning Earth, some nonbasic hate. Ironically cc is 3R.
Looking at that card makes me think a "fixed" Price of Progress would cost about 5R at a minimum __________________ Member Since 03/28/2001 12000+ posts 1st in posts in Ontario and Canada 9th in posts on MOTL 5th in Refs in Ontario Pushing to get to top 100 in MOTL Refs
|
daner Member
|
posted June 27, 2013 06:08 AM
![Click to send daner an Instant Message](http://classic.magictraders.com/ubb/im.gif) ![](http://classic.magictraders.com/ubb/div.gif) ![View daner's Have/Want List](http://classic.magictraders.com/ubb/icon1.gif)
Ruination reprint would be cute. Straight up one-sided Armgeddon in the Red based aggro deck for the most part.
|
choco man Member
|
posted June 27, 2013 06:56 AM
![Click to send choco man an Instant Message](http://classic.magictraders.com/ubb/im.gif) ![](http://classic.magictraders.com/ubb/div.gif) ![View choco man's Have/Want List](http://classic.magictraders.com/ubb/icon1.gif)
quote: Originally posted by revenger: M14 has spoiled Burning Earth, some nonbasic hate. Ironically cc is 3R.
Makes me miss Price of Progress so much. Has MTG changed so much that we can't have more than one playable burn spell at one time in standard?
|
Hyroko New Member
|
posted June 27, 2013 04:59 PM
![Click to send Hyroko an Instant Message](http://classic.magictraders.com/ubb/im.gif) ![](http://classic.magictraders.com/ubb/div.gif) ![View Hyroko's Have/Want List](http://classic.magictraders.com/ubb/icon1.gif)
You DO realise this is infinite mana with any of the "counting" lands and a crucible right? crucible only costs 3 also, so that makes it stupid easy.
|
Volcanon Member
|
posted June 27, 2013 05:27 PM
![Click to send Volcanon an Instant Message](http://classic.magictraders.com/ubb/im.gif)
quote: Originally posted by choco man: Makes me miss Price of Progress so much. Has MTG changed so much that we can't have more than one playable burn spell at one time in standard?
For the longest time the burn in standard was Hammer and shock. We actually have it better than most of the time.
|
JoshSherman Member
|
posted June 27, 2013 05:46 PM
![Click to send JoshSherman an Instant Message](http://classic.magictraders.com/ubb/im.gif) ![](http://classic.magictraders.com/ubb/div.gif) ![View JoshSherman's Have/Want List](http://classic.magictraders.com/ubb/icon1.gif)
quote: Originally posted by Hyroko: You DO realise this is infinite mana with any of the "counting" lands and a crucible right? crucible only costs 3 also, so that makes it stupid easy.
What? How do you intend to play any of them an infinite number of times in a turn? __________________ *My LJ*Letter Bombs!*FB*Logout- MM is a copycat! (So am I)*CKGB
|
choco man Member
|
posted June 28, 2013 12:31 AM
![Click to send choco man an Instant Message](http://classic.magictraders.com/ubb/im.gif) ![](http://classic.magictraders.com/ubb/div.gif) ![View choco man's Have/Want List](http://classic.magictraders.com/ubb/icon1.gif)
quote: Originally posted by Volcanon: For the longest time the burn in standard was Hammer and shock. We actually have it better than most of the time.
Burn was insanely deadly in the time of Hammer of Bogardan and Shock.
|
mm1983 Member
|
posted July 01, 2013 08:50 AM
![Click to send mm1983 an Instant Message](http://classic.magictraders.com/ubb/im.gif) ![](http://classic.magictraders.com/ubb/div.gif) ![View mm1983's Have/Want List](http://classic.magictraders.com/ubb/icon1.gif)
quote: Originally posted by WeedIan:
Looking at that card makes me think a "fixed" Price of Progress would cost about 5R at a minimum
I think they could do that at the 5R cost in the form of a creature. 2/2 when it enters the battlefield each player takes 2 damage for each non basic land he or she controls or else 4R for a 1/1 that does 1 damage for each non basic land.
|