Author
|
Topic: Wild card (sure to start a flame war somewhere along the way)
|
B14ckM4g3 Member
|
posted February 16, 2015 01:12 AM
So I've been discussing this scenario with several people, and have gotten quite a vary of responses. I would like to ask yourselves this question as well. Please, try to be civil to one another as one persons opinion may not agree with yours. No opinions are wrong (and the people I have asked so far range from L1-L3 judges, Pro tour winners and casuals) and no two have been the same. So here it is:
What if, for a period of 6-12 months, wizards unbanned every card in modern?How would you feel? What are your concerns? Is it overall a positive or negative move? Why??? Thank you for sharing!
[Edited 1 times, lastly by B14ckM4g3 on February 16, 2015]
|
psyduck_dude12 Member
|
posted February 16, 2015 10:18 AM
Modern would feel like legacy. Take stoneblade or bug most of those cards are modern prints. It would be a watered down legacy since you would have to use shocks instead of duals. I think the bannings have kept the format healthy (this is coming from a player who finished jund 2 weeks before banning and pod the day before banning).
|
LandDestroyer Member
|
posted February 16, 2015 10:28 AM
quote: Originally posted by psyduck_dude12: Modern would feel like legacy. Take stoneblade or bug most of those cards are modern prints. It would be a watered down legacy since you would have to use shocks instead of duals. I think the bannings have kept the format healthy (this is coming from a player who finished jund 2 weeks before banning and pod the day before banning).
I swear to Jace you better not start playing Twin next
|
Tim05 Member
|
posted February 16, 2015 12:48 PM
You'd probably end up seeing 3 or so decks as the only decks that would be able to place. I like the format with the bannings.
|
dfitzg88 Member
|
posted February 16, 2015 12:50 PM
quote: Originally posted by B14ckM4g3: What if, for a period of 6-12 months, wizards unbanned every card in modern?How would you feel? What are your concerns? Is it overall a positive or negative move? Why??? Thank you for sharing!
I'd be bothered by having to always think about the turn 3 kills in the format while brewing. "I can't play this because it doesn't have an answer to a turn 3 ascension kill AND shoal infect kill AND hypergenesis kill etc etc etc." Any card on the list that doesn't lead to a turn 3 kill doesnt bother me at all.
|
psyduck_dude12 Member
|
posted February 16, 2015 01:08 PM
quote: Originally posted by dfitzg88: I'd be bothered by having to always think about the turn 3 kills in the format while brewing. "I can't play this because it doesn't have an answer to a turn 3 ascension kill AND shoal infect kill AND hypergenesis kill etc etc etc."Any card on the list that doesn't lead to a turn 3 kill doesnt bother me at all.
thats actually a good point, there are cards like force of will and wasteland in legacy to help slow down a T3 kill, but in modern the variants are too week which would actually make it less fun.
|
gaeacradle Member
|
posted February 16, 2015 09:14 PM
quote: Originally posted by psyduck_dude12: thats actually a good point, there are cards like force of will and wasteland in legacy to help slow down a T3 kill, but in modern the variants are too week which would actually make it less fun.
Yeah. There aren't even Daze in Modern either. All we have is Pact of Negation (and you'll lose next turn) or the blue Shoal (blanking on the name right now).
|
Animosity Member
|
posted February 16, 2015 09:50 PM
LOL I have been saying it at my local store for months. Lets a total storm happen and then ban accordingly. Would be interesting. I wouldn't let it got for more then 3 months and expect emergency bans. Would be a really sweet train wreck to watch.
|
chaos021 Member
|
posted February 16, 2015 09:54 PM
quote: Originally posted by gaeacradle: Yeah. There aren't even Daze in Modern either. All we have is Pact of Negation (and you'll lose next turn) or the blue Shoal (blanking on the name right now).
There would be Mental Misstep with the unbannings. __________________ "Message to women worldwide: Girls....we're stupid. We don't like games. We don't know games. We can't read minds. Say it like you mean or STFU." -rockondonMy Sale Thread
|
thror Member
|
posted February 16, 2015 10:09 PM
misstep isnt going to stop anything but the hyper aggro decks though. the 1 drops from combo would be cantrips and maybe rite of flame.it does slow down infect i suppose. maybe. __________________ "He fights you not because you have wronged him, but because you are there."<crypticfreak1> jazaray got ahold of me. he also had a hard time finding the email. <Jazaray> She...
[Edited 1 times, lastly by thror on February 16, 2015]
|
bigballashotcaller Member
|
posted February 17, 2015 12:29 AM
The entire format would revolve around fast combo, Punishing Fires, and CounterTop decks with pretty bonkers kill conditions. It would be fun for people who like degenerate decks (think 'Old Extended' feel), but not very fun for people who like attacking with creatures and trying to get 'value' from Lingering Souls. EDIT: I would enjoy it, but I suspect that most people wouldn't, and it would be a massive overall net negative.
[Edited 1 times, lastly by bigballashotcaller on February 17, 2015]
|
Rabid Wo1f Member
|
posted February 17, 2015 05:40 AM
quote: Originally posted by chaos021: There would be Mental Misstep with the unbannings.
he was thinking disrupting shoal with his comment.
|
LandDestroyer Member
|
posted February 17, 2015 06:39 AM
Mental Mistep was printed during my 6 year break from magic. When i first saw the card upon coming back I was like "holy sht! this must be a 4 of in everything".is that how it was in modern? i have to assume for sure in legacy but what about modern and i guess legacy?
|
Pail42 Member
|
posted February 17, 2015 07:20 AM
quote: Originally posted by LandDestroyer: Mental Mistep was printed during my 6 year break from magic. When i first saw the card upon coming back I was like "holy sht! this must be a 4 of in everything".is that how it was in modern? i have to assume for sure in legacy but what about modern and i guess legacy?
It was banned when modern became sanctioned to allow for aggro decks to exist. It was banned after one B&R cycle in legacy because it just made more blue decks (they hoped it would fight blue in legacy) http://archive.wizards.com/Magic/Magazine/Article.aspx?x=mtg/daily/feature/161b
|
wayne Member
|
posted February 18, 2015 06:04 AM
quote: Originally posted by thror: misstep isnt going to stop anything but the hyper aggro decks though. the 1 drops from combo would be cantrips and maybe rite of flame.it does slow down infect i suppose. maybe.
Every deck would play Mental Misstep, at the very least to counter opponents' Mental Missteps.
|
flam flawless Member
|
posted February 18, 2015 10:50 AM
quote: Originally posted by wayne:
Every deck would play Mental Misstep, at the very least to counter opponents' Mental Missteps.
Or skullclamps...
|
mtglover Member
|
posted February 18, 2015 03:35 PM
Wouldn't a better idea be to unban the cards that was never given a chance in modern play?
|