Author
|
Topic: Trading with the same member more than once.
|
NukeMoose Member
|
posted March 04, 2006 08:03 PM
I was wondering if it would be worthwhile to add a simple column in each reflist that keeps track of the number of transactions with the same person. That way, the ref number won't increase, however, people scanning over the reflist will see the number of transactions you have made as well as with the number of different people.What do you all think? edit: I figured I might as well give my idea how to implement this, even though I don't know much about programming at all. But maybe the refchecker could see you've already listed them and send a different email asking the person to confirm making another transaction? Then it just keeps a tally and adds one each time they confirm. __________________ Suddenly, she couldn't see the acorns for the trees.Trade me your UL Might of Oaks and FOIL UL Might of Oaks, please!
[Edited 1 times, lastly by NukeMoose on March 04, 2006]
|
Goaswerfraiejen Member
|
posted March 04, 2006 10:07 PM
That would definitely be cool, especially for those of us who trade with the same people over and over. Whether or not there's any real call to implement it (especially if it would be particularly difficult), I'm not sure--but I definitely support the idea. __________________ "I have heard the mermaids singing, each to each. I do not think they will sing to me." -T.S. Eliot"Between that promise and the reality, there is an ocean. That ocean is called the Liberal Party." (Duceppe) RIP Ari
|
moxdiamd Member
|
posted March 05, 2006 04:04 PM
You could always just edit your comments on your ref stating how many trades you have done.__________________ Outer space exists because it's afraid to be on the same planet with Chuck Norris.
|
NukeMoose Member
|
posted March 05, 2006 08:35 PM
quote: Originally posted by moxdiamd: You could always just edit your comments on your ref stating how many trades you have done.
That is an option, but I doubt many people would or do utilize that. Then of course, you have to go through and read through all the comments. If it were it's own little column, then you could easily skim down the list looking at talley marks, or numbers or however it would be easiest on the eyes. If it were implemented the way it's like in my mind, it seems like people would actually put it to use. As a site based on refs and credibility, I think anything increases trader's awareness of each other is a good thing. __________________ Suddenly, she couldn't see the acorns for the trees.Trade me your UL Might of Oaks and FOIL UL Might of Oaks, please!
|
LT Member
|
posted March 07, 2006 11:06 PM
i am so for this idea....but if its hard to do then screw it..........
| |