Author
|
Topic: MTGO Wants/Haves
|
avery61 Banned
|
posted December 27, 2006 12:08 PM

I'd like to see a forum just for MTGO wants & haves, or at least a way to identify MTGO wants and haves from paper ones in the current haves/wants list.
|
nderdog Moderator
|
posted December 27, 2006 01:29 PM
  
It's been brought up from time to time, and always said that there isn't enough interest.For the time being, I encourage MTGO lists in the non-Magic forum so the trade matcher doesn't cause havoc, but I would like to see a new forum open for MTGO. __________________ Mort was already aware that love made you feel hot and cold and cruel and weak, but he hadn't realized that it could make you stupid. Report rules violations.
There's no need to fear, UNDERDOG is here!
|
Bob Phyllis Member
|
posted December 31, 2006 06:28 PM

quote: Originally posted by nderdog: I would like to see a new forum open for MTGO.
If word actually got out on MTGO it might increase traffic to the site...
|
avery61 Banned
|
posted January 02, 2007 10:52 AM

quote: Originally posted by Bob Phyllis: If word actually got out on MTGO it might increase traffic to the site...
I agree. It would be a great thing to be able to view lists here - it's much more user friendly then MODO.
|
Bob Phyllis Member
|
posted January 26, 2007 06:24 PM

How much work would it be to add a trial extra section for MTGO?
|
teroknorevents Member
|
posted January 28, 2007 11:56 PM

On the rare occasions that I actually list MTGO stuff, I just use the exclude tags to stop the trade matcher from screwing everything up.It seems as though the existing trade matcher could accomodate this by having separate MTGO sets defined. If I were to search for Wrath of God, I could theoretically then see copies listed both in paper sets and copies tagged as being from a set called '9th-MTGO' or something similar. This may be a slight kludge, but I believe Leshrac would be far happier to add about 40 sets that are copies of existing sets than to rewrite the whole matcher to deal with a pseudo-supertype. Fakeedit: It could also work with an added [mtgo][/mtgo] modifier tag, coded similar to if not identically to the current foil tags. __________________ Annorax DCI Level 1 Judge, RetiredClick here to get $100 free on PartyPoker
|
puregoblinboy47 Member
|
posted February 05, 2007 02:09 PM

If there were a forum dedicated to MTGO, I would use the hell out of it.If the own forum is out of the question, is it possible to allow people to make two h/w lists? One dedicated physical and one dedicated mtgo and have an icon to choose that differenciates the two to keep the trade matcher from going haywire?
|
raging_elf Member
|
posted February 06, 2007 04:41 AM

I would also use this alot
|