Author
|
Topic: Modern Format Official?
|
MeddlingMage Member
|
posted August 13, 2011 08:07 AM
  
quote: Originally posted by JoshSherman: I thought the idea was good until I read the banned list. **** that ****.
Ancestral Vision Ancient Den Bitterblossom Chrome Mox Dark Depths Dread Return Glimpse of Nature Golgari Grave-Troll Great Furnace Hypergenesis Jace, the Mind Sculptor Mental Misstep Seat of the Synod Sensei's Divining Top Skullclamp Stoneforge Mystic Sword of the Meek Tree of Tales Umezawa's Jitte Valakut, the Molten Pinnacle Vault of Whispers Seemed fun until I read some of those. I was going to build Fairies the second this format was a possibility (as I'm sure some others were too). We'll just have to see where it goes from here. ~MM __________________ I am MeddlingMage...YOUR Motl Survivor 11 Champion, 2007 Captain N award winner, 2010 Marlboro award winner.MafiaBass (9:48:50 PM): sorry my keyboard is sticky MeddlingEric (9:48:56 PM): ewwww MafiaBass (9:51:43 PM): FTR, I did not show you my e-pee-pee New keeper of the Logout button
|
Bugger Member
|
posted August 13, 2011 08:26 AM

quote: Originally posted by stu55: I thought you people were smart here. So much overreaction, they didn neuter control, they kept Vial in, so what?Honestly, I don't see Vial being a huge deal in this format. Its not like affinity is around or anything (at least in its old form) Yeah merfolk gets it, but when Zoo is running around, that makes it a lot worse. The reason they nuked the cards they did was to make a completely new format. The format would have been Zoo, Stoneforge Decks, Faeries and then everyone else. They want a format where either aggro decks can play or we see completely new stuff, like Tooth and Nail that hasn't seen serious play in years. 99% promise you that shocklands get reprinted in M13
Pretty much. "oh noes, I can't just pick up a decklist that was already hashed out years ago! Wide-open metagame, whaaaat?!" :head explodes: Oh, and to any complaining about how Zoo is simply going to be the overwhelming DTB, remember how everyone was absolutely certain that Valakut would immediately dominate standard after the Caw-Blade bannings.  __________________ "I never got any respect at all. My family moved a lot when I was a kid, but I always found them." -- Rodney Dangerfield
 |
super324 Member
|
posted August 13, 2011 08:27 AM
  
quote: Originally posted by -PoX-: Yeah that was 15 years ago. Every old playable card has gone up since then.
Actually that was 11-12, and duals were like printed 5 years before that. And shocklands were printed how many years ago in sets that were probably more mass produced then A/B/U/R? Modern doesnt use "old" cards it uses MODERN cards hence the name. __________________ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
|
Volcanon Member
|
posted August 13, 2011 09:05 AM

quote: Originally posted by MeddlingMage: Seemed fun until I read some of those. I was going to build Fairies the second this format was a possibility (as I'm sure some others were too). We'll just have to see where it goes from here.~MM
Ok so you're complaining that you can't build a hugely unfun deck? Boo Hoo.
|
msmike2 Member
|
posted August 13, 2011 10:33 AM

Was excited about the format til I saw the Banned List, would have been interesting to see some the the best standard decks of the last 10 years or so, go head to head. was gonna dust off the old affinity deck, but most of it got banned, I ran it in extended until it rotated out and my hardest deck to beat was Zoo, which got Vial now. PT Philly is gonna be 75% Zoo, 20% merfolk, 5% rouge. Wizards needs to learn if there gonna make a new format and actually want people to play it and keep people interested in it, let people play the fun cards. I think there should have been no ban list until the format has had time to realize what cards shouldn't be there.
|
CubFan81 Member
|
posted August 13, 2011 01:19 PM
  
quote: Originally posted by stu55: I thought you people were smart here. So much overreaction, they didn neuter control, they kept Vial in, so what?Honestly, I don't see Vial being a huge deal in this format. Its not like affinity is around or anything (at least in its old form) Yeah merfolk gets it, but when Zoo is running around, that makes it a lot worse. The reason they nuked the cards they did was to make a completely new format. The format would have been Zoo, Stoneforge Decks, Faeries and then everyone else. They want a format where either aggro decks can play or we see completely new stuff, like Tooth and Nail that hasn't seen serious play in years. 99% promise you that shocklands get reprinted in M13
This times whatever hyperbolic number you want. Everyone complained that the new Extended was just double standard and for the most part it was. By cutting out the cards they did they've at least allowed the format to have a chance to distinguish itself enough from previous versions of Extended, which is in all likely hood where they are trying to fit Modern into. Right now people play either Standard, Legacy, or EDH. Obviously there are pockets of Vintage and I'm sure there are some die-hard Extended fans (or even Overextended) but those first three are vastly different in deck construction, card playability, and metagames. A Faeries vs Stoneforge vs Zoo vs Jund vs Hypergenesis metagame for Modern would have been nauseatingly similar to past Standard and Extended seasons and could have turned people off from the beginning. My only disagreement would be that I would put it at 25% for the Shocklands in M13. If only because they took out the Painlands because their surveys told them new players don't like taking damage and can't conceptualize the benefits yet. That and they would have to eat up 10 rare slots right off the bat. As as much as you don't like MTG Salvation, the apparent rumor is a return to Ravnica after Innistrad which would allow them to split them among the different sets in the whole block like they did the first time. __________________ PMs don't work in Chrome or Firefox 4.0+, see HERE for work arounds.
 |
skizzikmonger Member
|
posted August 13, 2011 03:52 PM

quote: Originally posted by msmike2: I think there should have been no ban list until the format has had time to realize what cards shouldn't be there.
And let Ravager run with all 6 artifact lands AND Skullclamp? Caw-Blade was bad pre banning, but fully powered affinity with clamp was a lot worse. I may not agree with all of the cards on the banned list, but none of those cards are the 5 artifact lands and clamp.
[Edited 1 times, lastly by skizzikmonger on August 13, 2011]
|
rats60 Member
|
posted August 13, 2011 04:16 PM
  
quote: Originally posted by msmike2: Was excited about the format til I saw the Banned List, would have been interesting to see some the the best standard decks of the last 10 years or so, go head to head. was gonna dust off the old affinity deck, but most of it got banned, I ran it in extended until it rotated out and my hardest deck to beat was Zoo, which got Vial now. PT Philly is gonna be 75% Zoo, 20% merfolk, 5% rouge. Wizards needs to learn if there gonna make a new format and actually want people to play it and keep people interested in it, let people play the fun cards. I think there should have been no ban list until the format has had time to realize what cards shouldn't be there.
This is a Pro Tour. 95% of the pros aren't going to net deck. They are going to play test and come up with better decks. Now if this was a Grand Prix, you would have a bunch of people playing those decks.
|
thror Member
|
posted August 13, 2011 04:41 PM
  
quote: Originally posted by rats60: This is a Pro Tour. 95% of the pros aren't going to net deck. They are going to play test and come up with better decks. Now if this was a Grand Prix, you would have a bunch of people playing those decks.
What net decks would there even be? There aren't any, except old Ext and Standard decks to start with. You cant just go to SCG and see 2 years worth of Modern decks like you can with standard/legacy. Obviously EVERYONE has to test and build actual decks. Pros are going to start with things like zoo, 5cc, lark, mythic, jund, build a gauntlet, test, make tweaks, etc. And you will still have a large portion of the field playing the same 3-5 decks, because they're actually the best. The same would be true without the 2 dozen bannings. __________________ "He fights you not because you have wronged him, but because you are there."[16:17] <@BrassMan> what do you need new tech for? [16:18] <@BrassMan> gush is unrestricted [19:01] <nderEvo> you can delete yourself
[Edited 1 times, lastly by thror on August 13, 2011]
 |
Bugger Member
|
posted August 13, 2011 08:16 PM

quote: Originally posted by msmike2: I think there should have been no ban list until the format has had time to realize what cards shouldn't be there.
lolwut __________________ "I never got any respect at all. My family moved a lot when I was a kid, but I always found them." -- Rodney Dangerfield
|
Havoc Demon Member
|
posted August 13, 2011 09:00 PM

quote: Originally posted by msmike2: I think there should have been no ban list until the format has had time to realize what cards shouldn't be there.
Which would allow Ravager Affinity to destroy the format before it even starts.
|
choco man Member
|
posted August 13, 2011 09:42 PM
  
quote: Originally posted by CubFan81: Everyone complained that the new Extended was just double standard and for the most part it was. By cutting out the cards they did they've at least allowed the format to have a chance to distinguish itself enough from previous versions of Extended, which is in all likely hood where they are trying to fit Modern into.
Anyway they could sanction an Invasion to Time Spiral Format? That was the best extended format and the one everybody remembers being great.
quote: Originally posted by CubFan81: As as much as you don't like MTG Salvation, the apparent rumor is a return to Ravnica after Innistrad which would allow them to split them among the different sets in the whole block like they did the first time.
This would help sell the entire block of sets.
|
JoshSherman Member
|
posted August 14, 2011 02:41 PM
  
DRAGONSTORM!__________________ *MafiaBass*Joshweek*Letter Bombs!*Logout Mottle Salvation- a new place to play Mafia and WW
|
stu55 Member
|
posted August 14, 2011 03:01 PM

quote: Originally posted by msmike2: Was excited about the format til I saw the Banned List, would have been interesting to see some the the best standard decks of the last 10 years or so, go head to head. was gonna dust off the old affinity deck, but most of it got banned, I ran it in extended until it rotated out and my hardest deck to beat was Zoo, which got Vial now. PT Philly is gonna be 75% Zoo, 20% merfolk, 5% rouge. Wizards needs to learn if there gonna make a new format and actually want people to play it and keep people interested in it, let people play the fun cards. I think there should have been no ban list until the format has had time to realize what cards shouldn't be there.
glad you're not the one at wizards making the decisions.
|
AlmostGrown Member
|
posted August 14, 2011 03:29 PM
  
Wait, Black lotus isn't banned?__________________ send ref checks, paypal payment or any questions to the email in my profile! Serra Angel Count: 411 Nightmare Count: 128 DCI Rules Advisor PlasteredDragon - Gone but not forgotten
|
-PoX- Member
|
posted August 14, 2011 04:00 PM

quote: Originally posted by AlmostGrown: Wait, Black lotus isn't banned?
And neither is Chaos Orb! !!!!!!!!!!!!
|
WeedIan Member
|
posted August 15, 2011 05:34 AM
  
I still don't understand misstep being banned.Its good in legacy so ban it? Someone said misstep is format warping because it counters things? Force of Will has never been banned in a format it has been legal in. __________________ Member Since 03/28/2001 10000+ posts 3rd in posts in Ontario 15th in posts on MOTL Top 5 in Refs in Ontario (by people who location posted)
|
Mwapo Member
|
posted August 15, 2011 07:00 AM

quote: Originally posted by WeedIan: I still don't understand misstep being banned.Its good in legacy so ban it? Someone said misstep is format warping because it counters things? Force of Will has never been banned in a format it has been legal in.
They wanted to make sure that decks couldn't beat zoo and fish. Basically, they didn't think the direct port Legacy --> Modern Zoo decks were OP... but why not make them a little better by not having to worry about Misstep?
|
Glacier14 Member
|
posted August 15, 2011 09:28 AM
  
I still can't see why people are so upset about the banned list. The format is fairly wide open and it is pretty exciting time to be a deck builder. For those of you claiming the format will be domianted by Zoo/Fish then I would challenge you to actually test the format... because I am pretty sure you haven't. Those decks will be solid, yes... but format defining? Not even close.
|
gcowhsu Member
|
posted August 15, 2011 09:33 AM
  
Merfolk sucks without Force of will and Daze and/or Misstep. Try it.
[Edited 1 times, lastly by gcowhsu on August 15, 2011]
|
Devonin Member
|
posted August 15, 2011 09:46 AM
  
quote: Originally posted by Mwapo: They wanted to make sure that decks couldn't beat zoo and fish. Basically, they didn't think the direct port Legacy --> Modern Zoo decks were OP... but why not make them a little better by not having to worry about Misstep?
The article discussing the banned list seemed to say less about making Zoo/Fish stronger and more said "We realised after banning faeries, elf combo, Hyper Combo and Affinity, that we hadn't done anything to screw over blue, so everyone would be playing blue, so we banned a couple random good blue cards just to be safe"
| |