Author
|
Topic: Griselbrand to be banned in Legacy?
|
vexingdelvis Member
|
posted March 04, 2013 05:28 PM
With the recent play of TinFins in the last legacy open, and all of the show and tell metagame, griselbrand is becoming a ruthless creature. If you are familiar with legacy, you might know of a deck called TinFins. It works like reanimator, only with different cards to get what it needs, mainly griselbrand. It wins on turn two and three consistently. If you are wondering, it got second place at the legacy open yesterday, March 3,2013. I am just curious if wizards has thought about making a ban for griselbrand in legacy. It would definitely change the metagame, and I want some opinions about if they should ban him or not.__________________ CJB
|
Zeckk Member
|
posted March 04, 2013 06:28 PM
Too early for any bannings, though I wouldn't say it's a stretch to say that the DCI is keeping an eye on the rise in "cheat fatties into play" archetypes. It's not even really a new development, since such archetypes have put tribal aggro out on the street ever since Jin-Gitaxis showed up.
|
iccarus Member
|
posted March 04, 2013 06:34 PM
I really have been wondering this as well. Do they kill the fatties or do they hit the enablers? I mean, if they ban Show and Tell, it just puts the focus more on stuff like Sneak Attack or the reanimate spells. If they ban Griselbrand, it just puts a greater focus on stuff like Emrakul.Honestly, it's a tough decision and I don't know if there's a banning on one card that really gets to the heart of it. As it is now, Legacy seems dominated by the cheat fatties plan. __________________ Wisconsin - smells like dairy air!I collect Granite Gargoyles. Send them my way.
|
Bugger Member
|
posted March 04, 2013 06:40 PM
funny how reasonable mana costs don't balance cards in formats that can ignore them
|
skizzikmonger Member
|
posted March 04, 2013 07:32 PM
They won't ban the fatties because there's too many of them. I doubt they ban the reanimate spells because they can be answered by a 1/2 hybrid elf and a "free" black instant. If they ban anything, they'll ban Show and Tell and Sneak Attack.
|
coasterdude84 Member
|
posted March 04, 2013 08:54 PM
quote: Originally posted by skizzikmonger: They won't ban the fatties because there's too many of them. I doubt they ban the reanimate spells because they can be answered by a 1/2 hybrid elf and a "free" black instant. If they ban anything, they'll ban Show and Tell and Sneak Attack.
This exactly. And as Bugger mentioned, they could have a 49cc creature and it wouldn't matter because of the enablers. When Vengevine started going nuts, they didn't ban that, they banned Survival, the enabler. I wouldn't at all be surprised to see both Show and Tell and Sneak Attack get the axe.
|
iccarus Member
|
posted March 04, 2013 09:09 PM
quote: Originally posted by skizzikmonger: They won't ban the fatties because there's too many of them. I doubt they ban the reanimate spells because they can be answered by a 1/2 hybrid elf and a "free" black instant. If they ban anything, they'll ban Show and Tell and Sneak Attack.
Probably right. I think Show and Tell is the bigger problem, simply because it enables Omniscience as well. But there's certainly an argument to be made for yanking Sneak Attack as well. __________________ Wisconsin - smells like dairy air!I collect Granite Gargoyles. Send them my way.
|
Zeckk Member
|
posted March 04, 2013 10:26 PM
Given how incremental the rise in those decks has become, I think that they wouldn't go overboard with banning BOTH SnT and Sneak Attack. Banning SnT alone would destroy 2 distinct archetypes.
|
WeedIan Member
|
posted March 04, 2013 11:38 PM
Show and Tell should get the axe because it is very oppressive to other archetypes.The deck may not be broken to always but its a similar reason to why they banned BBE in modern. __________________ Member Since 03/28/2001 12000+ posts 1st in posts in Ontario 2nd in posts in Canada 10th in posts on MOTL 5th in Refs in Ontario Pushing to get to top 100 in MOTL Refs
|
Vegas10 Member
|
posted March 05, 2013 05:11 AM
quote: Originally posted by iccarus: Probably right. I think Show and Tell is the bigger problem, simply because it enables Omniscience as well. But there's certainly an argument to be made for yanking Sneak Attack as well.
how is Show and Tell anymore broken than any other fast combo deck in legacy? I mean there are lots of combo decks than can win t1 - t3, is this deck really more broken than any of those? And isn't legacy the format for insane things like that? most of the t16's still look very diverse seems like alor of decks are still playable, banning should be a last resort and only happen if a card waqrps the entire format, not sure that has happened with this since alot of the decks that were played and performing before Show and Tell still are performing even with it's presence. Also with so many cards availible is it possible people still havn't found the deck that owns Show and Tell maybe more inovation could happen instead of just ban something becasue it is difficult to beat if you don't adjust to it, just saying.
[Edited 1 times, lastly by Vegas10 on March 05, 2013]
|
stu55 Member
|
posted March 05, 2013 05:15 AM
I think you are all over-reacting. Legacy, like any format, swings through metagames. Legacy seems to do it faster than others. There was a time where combo was impossible due to Maverick and Stoneblade. A lot of people are also unprepared to handle such decks, thus allowing them to run over tournaments. I think it will swing back and people will stop complaining for bannings of these cards.
|
mulder Member
|
posted March 05, 2013 05:47 AM
quote: Originally posted by skizzikmonger: They won't ban the fatties because there's too many of them. I doubt they ban the reanimate spells because they can be answered by a 1/2 hybrid elf and a "free" black instant. If they ban anything, they'll ban Show and Tell and Sneak Attack.
Totally agree. Show And Tell is an abomination that needs to go.
|
iccarus Member
|
posted March 05, 2013 05:52 AM
quote: Originally posted by Vegas10: how is Show and Tell anymore broken than any other fast combo deck in legacy? I mean there are lots of combo decks than can win t1 - t3, is this deck really more broken than any of those? And isn't legacy the format for insane things like that? most of the t16's still look very diverse seems like alor of decks are still playable, banning should be a last resort and only happen if a card waqrps the entire format, not sure that has happened with this since alot of the decks that were played and performing before Show and Tell still are performing even with it's presence. Also with so many cards availible is it possible people still havn't found the deck that owns Show and Tell maybe more inovation could happen instead of just ban something becasue it is difficult to beat if you don't adjust to it, just saying.
Show and Tell is extremely easy to assembly with any number of single cards, essentially making it a two card combo. Emrakul, Grislebrand, Omniscience, etc. If you resolve that one spell, chances are the game is over. There's very little hate that specifically targets it as well. You either snag a piece of the combo with targeted discard or you manage to break through their counter wall. Obviously Legacy is full of combo and there are plenty of other broken plays, and SaT may just be the current flavor of the month in the meta. Is it oppressive yet? Probably not. I'm not saying it's going to be banned or should be banned. I'm just saying that if they were going to ban something, SaT would be the likely target since Emrakul was never meant to be played for three mana. I do agree that the meta will likely adapt and someone will find a deck that can compete against Sneak-and-Show combos, as well as the rest of the field. __________________ Wisconsin - smells like dairy air!I collect Granite Gargoyles. Send them my way.
|
Leeroy Member
|
posted March 05, 2013 07:22 AM
quote: Originally posted by iccarus: There's very little hate that specifically targets it as well. You either snag a piece of the combo with targeted discard or you manage to break through their counter wall.
Actually, you can hate most of their threats quite easily while circumventing the counter wall - just use their own Show & Tell and put into play Venser, Oblivion Ring or any other answer to whatever they may try to cheat in.
|
mulder Member
|
posted March 05, 2013 07:42 AM
quote: Originally posted by Leeroy: [QUOTE]Originally posted by iccarus: There's very little hate that specifically targets it as well. You either snag a piece of the combo with targeted discard or you manage to break through their counter wall.
Actually, you can hate most of their threats quite easily while circumventing the counter wall - just use their own Show & Tell and put into play Venser, Oblivion Ring or any other answer to whatever they may try to cheat in.[/QUOTE]That won't help if they Show And Tell Griselbrand, since they'll just draw 7 or 14 cards in response. The only thing that will help is Humility, which is a sideboard card at best.
|
Pail42 Member
|
posted March 05, 2013 09:45 AM
quote: Originally posted by mulder: That won't help if they Show And Tell Griselbrand, since they'll just draw 7 or 14 cards in response. The only thing that will help is Humility, which is a sideboard card at best.
Pithing Needle, Damping Matrix, Cursed Totem, Linvala, Keeper of Silence. There are lots of ways to stop Griselbrand from drawing cards, but I agree pretty much all of them are reactionary sideboard cards.
|
Soldier Boi Member
|
posted March 05, 2013 11:22 AM
I dont think they will ban anything. But if they do Griselbrand would be the correct choice. Griselbrand is the fattie and the enabler. Most decks can deal with Emrakul, Sneak Attack and Show and Tell. Its the drawing 7 cards anytime you please being the problem.But back to my orignal statement I dont think he will be banned. Its a 2 card combo that is more resiliant to counters, but this is why Jund and BUG has become so popular and more people are playing Hymn to Tourach again. Legacy changes a lot and people adapt. The format usually fixes itself.
|
coasterdude84 Member
|
posted March 05, 2013 11:59 AM
Yeah, and when they EOmyT Intuition => Show and Tell => Sneak Attack => Emrakul, (or some combination of that) I can pretty much just pack it in. Doesn't matter if I'm holding Needle or O-Ring, they can play around them so easily. I'm not saying it's nigh unstoppable, but for the sake of consistency, Survival was much easier to deal with and they banned that. I would expect these to not be long for the format.
|
mulder Member
|
posted March 05, 2013 12:14 PM
quote: Originally posted by Pail42: Pithing Needle, Damping Matrix, Cursed Totem, Linvala, Keeper of Silence.There are lots of ways to stop Griselbrand from drawing cards, but I agree pretty much all of them are reactionary sideboard cards.
True... But then there's still the small issue of the 7/7 flying lifelink :-(. Not to mention that those cards do nothing against Emrakul or even Progenitus... .
|
JoshSherman Member
|
posted March 05, 2013 12:23 PM
quote: Originally posted by Pail42: Pithing Needle, Damping Matrix, Cursed Totem, Linvala, Keeper of Silence.There are lots of ways to stop Griselbrand from drawing cards, but I agree pretty much all of them are reactionary sideboard cards.
Pardon my ignorance, but it looks to me like you're mentioning sideboard cards? What do you do game one?
[Edited 1 times, lastly by JoshSherman on March 05, 2013]
|
choco man Member
|
posted March 05, 2013 12:31 PM
quote: Originally posted by mulder: Totally agree. Show And Tell is an abomination that needs to go.
quote: Originally posted by mulder: True... But then there's still the small issue of the 7/7 flying lifelink :-(. Not to mention that those cards do nothing against Emrakul or even Progenitus... .
Show and Tell is completely fine. Yes, there are blowouts. For a card that symmetrical, there will always be blowouts. But most Legacy players have seen enough Show and Tells that are blow-outs the other way around also (Karakas locks out Emrakul, Venser/O-ring, Humility locks). Show and Tell is an okay card. What's crazy are the fatties. Show and Tell is not getting crazy, the fatties are getting crazier. Thank you EDH for Emrakul, Griselbrand, Omniscience, etc. Remember when Progenitus was the biggest baddest thing you can cheat out? Then it was Iona, then it was Emrakul, then it was Griselbrand..... And no one....no one questioned Show and Tell/Natural Order back when Progenitus was the badass. btw, with cursed totem a 7/7 flying lifelink is NOTHING. Under the same conditions, Sphinx of the Steel Wind is a 6/6 flying lifelink first strike with 2 protections and vigilance. You don't win enough games with just fatties attacking anymore. But the MO for legacy should be sit and wait. You think they should ban something graveyard related and then BOOM! Rest in Peace gets released. Hell, even Counterbalance-top owned for a majority of the year after Terminus was released and Counter-top didn't get ban. Wait and see.
[Edited 1 times, lastly by choco man on March 05, 2013]
|
Pail42 Member
|
posted March 05, 2013 12:49 PM
quote: Originally posted by JoshSherman: Pardon my ignorance, but it looks to me like you're mentioning sideboard cards? What do you do game one?
The best option against SaT is probably to play a different deck that can reliably win faster. There aren't a lot of defenses against Show and Tell. Appetite for Brains(Griselbrand) or Duress(Omniscience) might work 'okay' as a main deck options because they also affect other decks, or as Choco Man points out you could play permanents that are equally as nasty as your opponent's creature. IMHO, this is just another reason not to play competitive legacy. Reliable turn 2/3 are not fun to play against.
[Edited 1 times, lastly by Pail42 on March 05, 2013]
|
Welkren Wanderlust Member
|
posted March 05, 2013 12:53 PM
IMHO, Show and tell/Sneak Attack fatty decks are not the problem as most colors have a SB card that beats it and MRB has a bad match-up against this sort of combo anyways or otherwise can mitigate the effects of it (See: Innocent Blood, O-Ring, Journey To Nowhere/O-ring), and even decks like elfball and mavericks that feel like they have hopeless match-ups can potentially swarm a SnT or SnS deck if they focus on attacking every turn and sac their lands for the Emrakul attack). For me personally, though, I feel that SnT got a huge boost from the printing of Omniscience. As a card, omniscience essentially ends the game the turn they play SnT rather than following turn due to the ability of the deck at that point to just wishboard a win condition (burning wish/Petals of insight/Emrakul or storm). Omniscience also fundamentally ruins the interplay between gilded drake and and SnT, essentially creating a situation where SnT is a "risk-free" win-con. IMO, the smart move is not to ban the enablers suck as SnT or Sneak Attack (legacy should be the form for such cards after all), but rather to ban the one cards that gives that deck a disproportionate advantage against the checks and balences that the enablers were built around (SnT doesn't give haste, Sneak Attack is 4CMC 1 activation making it a slower card in a fast format). For me, that means banning Omniscience. Banning Omniscience slows SnT down one turn, buying a crucial turn for the deck's opponents to respond and putting the ball in the court of the SnT player to protect their BFB (Big-Fat-Bastard). Just my opinion on the SnT problem. __________________ (>")>
|
marlo213 Member
|
posted March 05, 2013 01:02 PM
Why doesn't everyone want something banned? How about we unban some stuff, like mind twist, earthcraft or yawgmoth's bargain? But seriously, wizards only ban stuff that the people don't see coming, like BBE or seething song. So if they were to ban something for the SaT deck, it would probably be ancient tomb or lotus petal
|
WeedIan Member
|
posted March 05, 2013 01:42 PM
quote: Originally posted by marlo213: Why doesn't everyone want something banned? How about we unban some stuff, like mind twist, earthcraft or yawgmoth's bargain? But seriously, wizards only ban stuff that the people don't see coming, like BBE or seething song. So if they were to ban something for the SaT deck, it would probably be ancient tomb or lotus petal
You seriously think bargain is safe to unban?
| |