Author
|
Topic: M15 spoilers
|
skizzikmonger Member
|
posted June 29, 2014 11:52 PM

Love new Garruk for BUG Midrange or ControlChord of Calling is being reprinted Edit: Can I cast Myr Superion using Convoke?
[Edited 1 times, lastly by skizzikmonger on June 30, 2014]
|
Pail42 Member
|
posted June 30, 2014 07:39 AM

quote: Originally posted by skizzikmonger: Edit: Can I cast Myr Superion using Convoke?
Myr Superion doesn't say you HAVE to use mana from creatures in order to cast it - it says any mana you use has to come from creatures. Using zero mana to cast it fulfills the requirement. Edit to remove incorrect statement.
[Edited 2 times, lastly by Pail42 on June 30, 2014]
|
revenger Member
|
posted June 30, 2014 11:31 AM
  
Whats with the new Garruk? Whats his trip?__________________ 28th in refs on Motl! #1 Ref's for Arizona! I offer 3rd party trading services. Email if interested. Your 2008, 2010 & 2012 Siskel & Ebert award winner! Your Motl runner-up in My Cousin Vinny & Rolling Stone Award!
|
iccarus Member
|
posted June 30, 2014 12:26 PM

quote: Originally posted by revenger: Whats with the new Garruk? Whats his trip?
Are you asking about the storyline reasons for his appearance or does your comment have some other meaning? This is the latest progression of the curse put on him by Liliana, using the chain veil. http://mtgsalvation.gamepedia.com/Garruk_Wildspeaker
__________________ Wisconsin - smells like dairy air!I collect Granite Gargoyles. Send them my way.
|
revenger Member
|
posted June 30, 2014 12:29 PM
  
quote: Originally posted by iccarus: Are you asking about the storyline reasons for his appearance or does your comment have some other meaning?This is the latest progression of the curse put on him by Liliana, using the chain veil. http://mtgsalvation.gamepedia.com/Garruk_Wildspeaker
Storywise. He's flipped out. He's went to the dark side.
|
Sovarius Member
|
posted June 30, 2014 12:51 PM
  
quote: Originally posted by Pail42: Covoke reduces the mana cost of the spell, so if you give it Covoke and tap two creatures the cost becomes zero.Myr Superion doesn't say you HAVE to use mana from creatures in order to cast it - it says any mana you use has to come from creatures. Using zero mana to cast it fulfills the requirement.
The reminder text says otherwise - like, almost completely the opposite. "Each creature you tap while costing this spell pays for 1 or one mana of that creature's color". So i think you are right but for the wrong reason. __________________ Want Drana, Kalastria Bloodchief, and other vampire females oddities (foreign, foil, crimp, miscut, misprint, sign, test print, alters, artist proofs, etc)
|
Pail42 Member
|
posted June 30, 2014 01:13 PM

quote: Originally posted by Sovarius: So i think you are right but for the wrong reason.
Indeed. If you didn't pay mana that came from something other than a creature you can play Myr Superion. Convoke pays for the spell without paying mana. Here is the official convoke text: "702.50a Convoke is a static ability that functions while the spell with convoke is on the stack. “Convoke” means “For each colored mana in this spell’s total cost, you may tap an untapped creature of that color you control rather than pay that mana. For each generic mana in this spell’s total cost, you may tap an untapped creature you control rather than pay that mana.” The convoke ability isn’t an additional or alternative cost and applies only after the total cost of the spell with convoke is determined."
|
revenger Member
|
posted June 30, 2014 01:17 PM
  
They killed Elspeth! BASTARDS!__________________ 28th in refs on Motl! #1 Ref's for Arizona! I offer 3rd party trading services. Email if interested. Your 2008, 2010 & 2012 Siskel & Ebert award winner! Your Motl runner-up in My Cousin Vinny & Rolling Stone Award!
|
mm1983 Member
|
posted June 30, 2014 01:19 PM
  
quote: Originally posted by Pail42:
Indeed. If you didn't pay mana that came from something other than a creature you can play Myr Superion. Convoke pays for the spell without paying mana.Here is the official convoke text: "702.50a Convoke is a static ability that functions while the spell with convoke is on the stack. “Convoke” means “For each colored mana in this spell’s total cost, you may tap an untapped creature of that color you control rather than pay that mana. For each generic mana in this spell’s total cost, you may tap an untapped creature you control rather than pay that mana.” The convoke ability isn’t an additional or alternative cost and applies only after the total cost of the spell with convoke is determined."
Anything that lowers the cost of Myr Superion to 0 allows you to play him for 0 cost whether it's a Heartless Summoning, tapping 2 creatures to convoke, something that puts directly into play from hand, graveyard, or library, or any other in play effects that lowers the cost of artifacts by 2.
 |
coasterdude84 Member
|
posted June 30, 2014 01:23 PM

quote: Originally posted by Sovarius: The reminder text says otherwise - like, almost completely the opposite. "Each creature you tap while costing this spell pays for 1 or one mana of that creature's color".So i think you are right but for the wrong reason.
That reminder text reads kind of weird, like, Portal weird. The old Convoke reminder text says, "Each creature you tap while playing this spell reduces its cost by (1) or by one of that that creature's color." That's curious because I could see situations where it would make a difference, for instance, Trinisphere. Trinisphere applies after all other cost adders/reducers take effect, then checks to make sure it's at least 3. Under the old wording, you would always have to pay at least 3, even if you otherwise reduced it to 0. Under the new wording though, it reads like you're actually paying the mana cost, such that you could sneak it in under a 3-sphere. Any rules gurus have further insight into this?
|
harbingerofthevoid Member
|
posted June 30, 2014 02:38 PM
  
"paying" and "producing" would be 2 different things right?So tapping 2 creatures to activate convoke wouldn't be the same as tapping: add {1}
|
Pail42 Member
|
posted June 30, 2014 04:47 PM

It looks like coasterdude is correct on the implications. Convoke's function was changed from a cost reducer to what it is now for the M14 rules update - article has a decent explanation: [URL=http://archive.wizards.com/Magic/magazine/article.aspx?x=mtg/daily/feature/255c&page=3]http://archive.wizards.com/Magic/magazine/article.aspx?x=mtg/daily/feature/255c&page=3[/ URL] I guess we should have all expected convoke to show up again soon since they decided to do a major overhaul on the rules last year. "I don't remember exactly how the conversation started, but one day a few months ago R&D ended up talking about how weird it was that you could "overtap" when casting a spell using convoke. That was weird, past-me thought, so I started thinking about ways to change that. As a cost-reduction ability, it couldn't really be contained. You can make a spell cost a billion mana less if you want to. I sought the advice of Rules Manager Emeritus Mark Gottlieb. Together, we came up with a new paradigm for convoke: what if instead of reducing the cost, tapping creatures was just another way of paying mana? So now it is! You don't declare which creatures you're tapping ahead of time, just like you don't declare what lands you'll be tapping ahead of time. When it comes time to pay the spell's costs (rule 601.2g), you can tap creatures rather than pay mana. Note that this is after you have a chance to activate mana abilities (rule 601.2f). This means that if you intend to sacrifice a creature to activate a mana ability, you can't also tap that creature for convoke."
[Edited 2 times, lastly by Pail42 on June 30, 2014]
 |
Sovarius Member
|
posted June 30, 2014 05:28 PM
  
That's incredibly interesting to me. The new rules make a hell of a lot more sense, but still... that reminder text. Shudder.quote: Originally posted by revenger: They killed Elspeth! BASTARDS!
That's old news, relatively speaking. But i am not really sure doubleyew tee eff is actually happening with that - as a planeswalker there are really very few ways to die. Also, as a planeswalker, how is "hell", or whatever ErebosLand is called, NOT on a plane? If it's a really fanciful mystical magical place on the plane of Theros, can't she 'walk? If it's a seperate plane, then shouldn't she be able to 'walk like any other plane? Why is Ajani so mad bro? Can't he just 'walk there? I read the books and snippets of stories that have unfortunately come to replace the books, i can't figure out why this is special. Teferi was once 'destroyed' by Nicol Bolas but reconstituted soon after. Jeska survived being struck by the Mirari sword. Nicol Bolas was attacked with an emulation of Night's mask and decayed to nothing, but reconstituted himself as well. Most of the planeswalkers that have died were sacrifices from what i know. Venser, Freyalise, Windgrace, and at least one other in Time Spiral's events i think. If i remember correctly, most planeswalkers don't even know how to actually end another planeswalkers existence. Is this just a new thing for planeswalkers post-mending? __________________ Want Drana, Kalastria Bloodchief, and other vampire females oddities (foreign, foil, crimp, miscut, misprint, sign, test print, alters, artist proofs, etc)
 |
chaos021 Member
|
posted June 30, 2014 06:10 PM
  
I know post-mending they no longer have infinite life.__________________ "Message to women worldwide: Girls....we're stupid. We don't like games. We don't know games. We can't read minds. Say it like you mean or STFU." -rockondonMy Sale Thread
|
Sovarius Member
|
posted July 01, 2014 09:43 AM
  
It sounds like post-mending, the overhaul of the sparks power is how the multiverse kind of righted itself.It also sounds like that doesn't explain why she can't planeswalk away, or Ajani there, or why Xenagos needs to be a God of Theros, instead of someone with arbitrarily large amounts of power and presumably the ability to make himself larger and nyx-sparkly. It seems very unlikely still that Xenagos is permadeath'ed so there could be a return to Theros someday. __________________ Want Drana, Kalastria Bloodchief, and other vampire females oddities (foreign, foil, crimp, miscut, misprint, sign, test print, alters, artist proofs, etc)
|
chaos021 Member
|
posted July 01, 2014 10:05 AM
  
quote: Originally posted by Sovarius: It seems very unlikely still that Xenagos is permadeath'ed so there could be a return to Theros someday.
That would really make me sad to learn the power of Godsend isn't what I think it is. __________________ "Message to women worldwide: Girls....we're stupid. We don't like games. We don't know games. We can't read minds. Say it like you mean or STFU." -rockondonMy Sale Thread
|
revenger Member
|
posted July 01, 2014 02:01 PM
  
well, M15 is at least returning to mediocrity with recent cards such as Stain the Mind and Garruk, Apex Predator.__________________ 28th in refs on Motl! #1 Ref's for Arizona! I offer 3rd party trading services. Email if interested. Your 2008, 2010 & 2012 Siskel & Ebert award winner! Your Motl runner-up in My Cousin Vinny & Rolling Stone Award!
|
skizzikmonger Member
|
posted July 01, 2014 09:50 PM

quote: Originally posted by revenger: well, M15 is at least returning to mediocrity with recent cards such as Stain the Mind and Garruk, Apex Predator.
What's wrong with Garruk?
|
Volcanon Member
|
posted July 01, 2014 10:22 PM

quote: Originally posted by skizzikmonger: What's wrong with Garruk?
He's a casual card, I guess? It's kind of cool that they are continuing the whole cursed thing.
|
nylarotep Member
|
posted July 02, 2014 11:14 AM
  
Lots of mythics/rares that are unplayable in draft in this set should make drafting decisions easier.
|
revenger Member
|
posted July 02, 2014 12:00 PM
  
quote: Originally posted by skizzikmonger: What's wrong with Garruk?
Was referring to how those 2 cards are bring it up back to medoricrity.
|
AEther Storm Member
|
posted July 02, 2014 12:50 PM
  
quote: Originally posted by Sovarius: ..If i remember correctly, most planeswalkers don't even know how to actually end another planeswalkers existence.
Urza could teach you a few things, planting bombs in the machines operated by a few planeswalkers that entered Phyrexia. Forgotten their names and to lazy to look up.
__________________ I'm a geek, you're a geek. Let's trade.Lord Flasheart: Enter the man who has no underwear. Ask me why. Lieutenant George: Why do you have no underwear, Lord Flash? Lord Flasheart: Because the pants haven't been built yet that'll take the job on!
|
chaos021 Member
|
posted July 02, 2014 06:24 PM
  
quote: Originally posted by AEther Storm: Urza could teach you a few things, planting bombs in the machines operated by a few planeswalkers that entered Phyrexia. Forgotten their names and to lazy to look up.
Like Freyalise and company? __________________ "Message to women worldwide: Girls....we're stupid. We don't like games. We don't know games. We can't read minds. Say it like you mean or STFU." -rockondonMy Sale Thread
|
oneofchaos Member
|
posted July 05, 2014 03:12 PM

I guess back to nature says WOTC doesn't like Theros block, or more like #@(@# you for playing with enchantments. Sigh.
|
revenger Member
|
posted July 06, 2014 10:45 AM
  
quote: Originally posted by oneofchaos: I guess back to nature says WOTC doesn't like Theros block, or more like #@(@# you for playing with enchantments. Sigh.
I see it as a trying to balance out the type 2 scene. __________________ 28th in refs on Motl! #1 Ref's for Arizona! I offer 3rd party trading services. Email if interested. Your 2008, 2010 & 2012 Siskel & Ebert award winner! Your Motl runner-up in My Cousin Vinny & Rolling Stone Award!
| |