Author
|
Topic: Post For Magic Stuff, Fifty-Deuce
|
joz Banned
|
posted April 24, 2011 01:19 PM
MTG is boring now...to many Spikes in casual just trying to win with Netdecks; instead of good players trying to play Magic the Gathering.
|
-PoX- Member
|
posted April 24, 2011 02:23 PM
quote: Originally posted by joz: MTG is boring now...to many Spikes in casual just trying to win with Netdecks; instead of good players trying to play Magic the Gathering.
WoTC should ban the internet or at least restrict it to one internet per deck.
|
Thanos Member
|
posted April 24, 2011 05:52 PM
Another one:http://cgi.ebay.com/2x-Jace-Beleren-Book-Promo-Very-Rare-Signed-Artist-/130512735126?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item1e632a4b96 Sure as hell ain't the artist's sig...
|
Bugger Member
|
posted April 24, 2011 06:19 PM
quote: Originally posted by joz: trololololol
Fixed that for ya. __________________ "Where free unions and collective bargaining are forbidden, freedom is lost." -- Ronald Reagan
|
Thanos Member
|
posted April 24, 2011 07:49 PM
If anyone buys off ebay and uses ebay bucks, they are running a promo where if you DL the new Internet Explorer and buy of ebay through it, you get $5.00 credited to your ebay bucks, along with 8% more ebay bucks with other purchases till early May.
|
Mr.C Member
|
posted April 24, 2011 09:13 PM
quote: Originally posted by joz: MTG is boring now...to many Spikes in casual just trying to win with Netdecks; instead of good players trying to play Magic the Gathering.
I do agree with him to an extent. Its boring to show up to FNM and all I see is Caw-Blade. So I draft. __________________ #1 in posts from Brazil!#3 in Refs from Brazil; Got any Portuguese Foils? Post on my list or email me at valter.cid@gmail.com !
|
Volcanon Member
|
posted April 24, 2011 09:50 PM
T2 has sucked since Lorwyn was printed. What else is new?Looks like they spoiled the entire New Phyrexia on mtg.com early. Cuz, like, some other guy spoiled the godbook.
[Edited 1 times, lastly by Volcanon on April 24, 2011]
|
Markers Member
|
posted April 25, 2011 01:06 AM
That is not the artistīs sig...http://cgi.ebay.com/2x-Jace-Beleren-Book-Promo-Very-Rare-Signed-Artist-/130512735126?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item1e632a4b96 __________________ Collecting signed cards. PM me...Beta: 277/302 signed AN: 87/92 signed AQ: 97/100 signed LG: 267/310 signed DK set: 97/119 signed FE set: 175/187 signed Total signed cards: 23'953 my stuff
|
AlmostGrown Member
|
posted April 25, 2011 03:29 AM
quote: Originally posted by Volcanon: T2 has sucked since Lorwyn was printed. What else is new?Looks like they spoiled the entire New Phyrexia on mtg.com early. Cuz, like, some other guy spoiled the godbook.
This week on dailymtg.com is gonna be awkward as hell __________________ send ref checks, paypal payment or any questions to the email in my profile! Serra Angel Count: 274 Nightmare Count: 107 DCI Rules Advisor PlasteredDragon - Gone but not forgotten
|
Thanos Member
|
posted April 25, 2011 05:55 AM
quote: Originally posted by Markers: That is not the artistīs sig...http://cgi.ebay.com/2x-Jace-Beleren-Book-Promo-V ery-Rare-Signed-Artist-/130512735126?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item1e632a4b96
Seems there is a lot of that going around on eBay these days.
|
caquaa Member
|
posted April 25, 2011 07:48 AM
to the best of my knowledge, this is Aleski's actual sig:http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c240/caquaa/mtg/FoilJapLilliana.jpg purchased from a reputable person (whom I forgotten, lol) but I know the Garfield sig is legit. Cheap scanner + not the newest sleeve = bad scan, but it works I guess. It doesn't even look foil in that scan
[Edited 1 times, lastly by caquaa on April 25, 2011]
|
Thanos Member
|
posted April 25, 2011 08:14 AM
quote: Originally posted by caquaa: to the best of my knowledge, this is Aleski's actual sig:http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c240/caquaa/mtg/FoilJapLilliana.jpg purchased from a reputable person (whom I forgotten, lol) but I know the Garfield sig is legit. Cheap scanner + not the newest sleeve = bad scan, but it works I guess. It doesn't even look foil in that scan
That's it. His sig is one of the more consistent ones out there.
|
Aznopium Member
|
posted April 25, 2011 09:16 AM
http://www.starcitygames.com/magic/standard/21689_Round_7_Gerry_Thompson_vs_Jere my_Dombek.htmlLooks like ripper extraordinaire j dombek made an appearance at the scg tourney over the weekend. http://classic.magictraders.com/ubb/Forum5/HTML/000848.html
[Edited 1 times, lastly by Aznopium on April 25, 2011]
|
sammyt125 Member
|
posted April 25, 2011 10:36 AM
quote: Originally posted by Aznopium: http://www.starcitygames.com/magic/standard/21689_Round_7_Gerry_Thompson_vs_J ere my_Dombek.htmlLooks like ripper extraordinaire j dombek made an appearance at the scg tourney over the weekend. http://classic.magictraders.com/ubb/Forum5/HTML/000848.html
I called him out on ggslive chat once and he made up a BS story about how he wasn't a ripper and everything. The story he told me didn't do a very good job explaining why he was impersonating people, though.
|
farsk8dutch Member
|
posted April 25, 2011 03:58 PM
On my way to SCG Boston's Legacy, about ten minutes from the event, I got a flat and the tie-rod broke. Instead of just having it towed and taking a cab I went to the tow station. Ironicly, I'd have been better off dealing more damage.
|
JesusChristMD Member
|
posted April 25, 2011 06:13 PM
I'm pretty sure the sigs on those book jaces are the AUTHOR of the book. A friend of mine won a random drawing online and got a book jace straight from wizards with a sig that looks just like that.__________________ Quoth the Raven, "Nevermore"
|
OGB Member
|
posted April 26, 2011 06:27 AM
Happy anniversary, Gum Stick Cards!http://classic.magictraders.com/ubb/Forum12/HTML/016901.html __________________ 2010 Homer Simpson Award Winnerhttp://classic.magictraders.com/ubb/Forum12/HTML/016901.html
|
ninjazwig Member
|
posted April 26, 2011 06:33 AM
quote: Originally posted by OGB: Happy anniversary, Gum Stick Cards!http://classic.magictraders.com/ubb/Forum12/HTML/016901.html
I lol'd, that was awesome.
|
Shap Member
|
posted April 26, 2011 11:15 AM
quote: Originally posted by Schwingzilla: I'm aware it's a violation of eBay rules.When I'm buying goods, I have no problem if the seller has higher shipping and handling prices. Personally, I would rather have money given to the seller than eBay. What they did is close a loophole that people take advantage of. And to say sellers who do this are ripping people off is ridiculous. Reducing the fees for selling lowers the price for the buyer in the end. What, do you just go on eBay and buy goods without ever even looking at the shipping cost? Now that you can't be ripped off by the seller "hiding" the cost of the item in the shipping number one line below the sale price, are you now going to completely ignore shipping costs? Shipping is part of what you pay. I never misled people in any way.
I agree with you 100% - never understood why people can't combine the two numbers for the total cost.That said, never underestimate the stupidity of the public. I honestly think a lot of people (more than you can possibly imagine) REALLY DO ignore the shipping cost until they win the auction, then get all ****y about it.
[Edited 1 times, lastly by Shap on April 26, 2011]
|
Volcanon Member
|
posted April 26, 2011 11:20 AM
quote: Originally posted by Shap: [QUOTE]Originally posted by Schwingzilla: I'm aware it's a violation of eBay rules.When I'm buying goods, I have no problem if the seller has higher shipping and handling prices. Personally, I would rather have money given to the seller than eBay. What they did is close a loophole that people take advantage of. And to say sellers who do this are ripping people off is ridiculous. Reducing the fees for selling lowers the price for the buyer in the end. What, do you just go on eBay and buy goods without ever even looking at the shipping cost? Now that you can't be ripped off by the seller "hiding" the cost of the item in the shipping number one line below the sale price, are you now going to completely ignore shipping costs? Shipping is part of what you pay. I never misled people in any way.
I agree with you 100% - never understood why people can't combine the two numbers for the total cost.That said, never underestimate the stupidity of the public. I honestly think a lot of people (more than you can possibly imagine) REALLY DO ignore the shipping cost until they win the auction, they get all ****y about it.[/QUOTE] Buyers expect a reasonable shipping cost. Ebay now gives the option of seeing a combined bid price + shipping option, but it isn't the default. Do yourself a favour and don't overcharge shipping. eBay is telling you, by the way, by not letting you neg buyers that you should stop overcharging on shipping or face the big negs. If you abuse the shipping fees too much you'll end up like video games, where eBay forces you to take a loss on shipping fees by mandating that shipping fees MUST be a certain price. I've noticed, anyway, that my stuff sells way better when I make it free shipping. Might be psychological or something. When I charged $10-15 for something that had to be registered, it consistently sold for $20+ less than if I offered free shipping with registered "as a throwin."
|
Magik321 Member
|
posted April 26, 2011 11:31 AM
quote: Originally posted by Schwingzilla: That's bad. It will create an equilibrium where sales prices are now higher by 9% of the shipping cost, is all.Using high shipping costs to get around the fees is a good way to lower the price of goods. I've done it lots of times to sell items I would not otherwise even bother listing. I have no sympathy for buyers who are incapable of adding two numbers that are clearly displayed. Hey, if a good is nine dollars and shipping is thirty, the price of the good is 39 dollars, end of story. It is completely meaningless how much I'm paying for "shipping" or "sales price." Though, as it's doing nothing but increase fees for sellers, and this will trickle down into prices for buyers, especially for fees that sellers don't have control over if you calculate shipping after purchase, it will drive a few more people away from eBay. And toward MOTL, hopefully. So that's good.
Then don't sell on ebay. Their fees (while ridiculous) are made clear to sellers. If you want to sell on the site you should abide by their policies. You are one seller I'll like to see ebay suspending. Always good to get rid of such sellers anyway. Whether buyers can't add two numbers together is another matter by itself. One good reason why ebay is now charging fees for shipping is due to people like you. Guess they noticed too many people trying to circumvent fees that ebay decided to fix the problem once and for all. Sellers that charge a low price for the listing but a ridiculous shipping cost aren't playing on a same level fieldas everyone else. Why should you be the special one that don't have to pay the full fees when everyone else are doing so? You want lower fees, get a top rated seller then instead of pulling our such stunts to reduce your fees. __________________ Have/Want List References Email me: magik_321@hotmail.com
|
CubFan81 Member
|
posted April 26, 2011 11:33 AM
quote: Originally posted by Volcanon: I've noticed, anyway, that my stuff sells way better when I make it free shipping. Might be psychological or something. When I charged $10-15 for something that had to be registered, it consistently sold for $20+ less than if I offered free shipping with registered "as a throwin."
This may be a new benefit from their policy to take fees from the shipping cost. If I'm going to lose money to them either way I'd probably prefer to offer "Free" shipping and see where the auction goes. For Magic cards, it's probably only a few cents here and there but it will probably show a more accurate reflection of what people are willing to pay for cards. I personally always combine the shipping cost into my bid (ie: Only want to spend about 6.50-7.00 per card and the shipping is $3.00 then I'd only bid $25 on a playset). If a large portion of auctions start going listing Free shipping (I doubt it would happen as much as I'd like because eBay might be full of more idiots than MTG Salvation) then MOTL's price guide would reflect that as well.
[Edited 1 times, lastly by CubFan81 on April 26, 2011]
|
Volcanon Member
|
posted April 26, 2011 11:40 AM
quote: Originally posted by CubFan81: This may be a new benefit from their policy to take fees from the shipping cost. If I'm going to lose money to them either way I'd probably prefer to offer "Free" shipping and see where the auction goes.For Magic cards, it's probably only a few cents here and there but it will probably show a more accurate reflection of what people are willing to pay for cards. I personally always combine the shipping cost into my bid (ie: Only want to spend about 6.50-7.00 per card and the shipping is $3.00 then I'd only bid $25 on a playset). If a large portion of auctions start going listing Free shipping (I doubt it would happen as much as I'd like because eBay might be full of more idiots than MTG Salvation) then MOTL's price guide would reflect that as well.
I don't even bother to check what my net profit is on ebay sales. I know I'm making some money, cuz the stuff I'm selling I bought when it was basically value-less. I doubt my fees any less for not charging shipping though. eBay's point is that they don't want bidders to have to combine shipping when they are making a bid. Because ebay doesn't extend bid times after "shotgun" bids like Yahoo Japan Auction does, they clearly want people to "get into the mood" and bid for the sky on things they want (this means, of course, more fees for them.) Yes, it is unfair to put the entire burden of fees on the seller - Y!J splits it and makes the buyer pay the credit card fees for credit card payment instead of the seller. I think this is frankly more fair, but the system is what it is and eBay is the only site where you can really hope to reach a good pool of customers (for now).
[Edited 1 times, lastly by Volcanon on April 26, 2011]
|
stu55 Member
|
posted April 26, 2011 12:04 PM
Anyone else think it funny when Jshields offers to sell cards or buy cards at like 20% less then the people post them for? Or am I alone on this one?
|
Aznopium Member
|
posted April 26, 2011 12:06 PM
quote: Originally posted by stu55: Anyone else think it funny when Jshields offers to sell cards or buy cards at like 20% less then the people post them for? Or am I alone on this one?
not alone, stu. not alone.
|