Author
|
Topic: Post for NBA 2012/2013: The Luxury Tax files.
|
skizzikmonger Member
|
posted March 19, 2013 07:32 PM

Lucky #13__________________ I survive entirely on caffeine and hateMILF: it does a body good
|
choco man Member
|
posted March 20, 2013 09:33 AM
  
http://www.usatoday.com/story/gameon/2013/03/20/chris-paul-flop-los-angeles-clipp ers/2002353/This is why the Grizzlies lost in the playoffs last year (in what was the best series last season). Fine the fool, then at least a charity would benefit from the dirtbag. edit: Harsh, I know. But they knocked-out my team last year. 
[Edited 1 times, lastly by choco man on March 20, 2013]
|
skizzikmonger Member
|
posted March 20, 2013 09:39 AM

quote: Originally posted by choco man: http://www.usatoday.com/story/gameon/2013/03/20/chris-paul-flop-los-angeles-cl ipp ers/2002353/This is why the Grizzlies lost in the playoffs last year (in what was the best series last season). Fine the fool, then at least a charity would benefit from the dirtbag. edit: Harsh, I know. But they knocked-out my team last year. 
That's not harsh at all IMO. Flopping has been a problem in the NBA for years, and only now is the league even trying to do doing something about it.
|
junichi Moderator
|
posted March 20, 2013 09:49 AM
  
quote: Originally posted by choco man: http://www.usatoday.com/story/gameon/2013/03/20/chris-paul-flop-los-angeles-cl ipp ers/2002353/This is why the Grizzlies lost in the playoffs last year (in what was the best series last season). Fine the fool, then at least a charity would benefit from the dirtbag. edit: Harsh, I know. But they knocked-out my team last year. 
The sniper got him.
__________________ ****Attention****DO NOT send cards to Jon Strickland, 1971 St.Laurent Blvd Apt 705, Ottawa Ontario, Canada K1G 3P8. He is a known ripper/hacker.
|
CubFan81 Member
|
posted March 21, 2013 06:23 AM

quote: Originally posted by choco man: Fine the fool, then at least a charity would benefit from the dirtbag.edit: Harsh, I know. But they knocked-out my team last year. 
Not harsh at all. If they really want to cut down on flopping the NBA, not random blogs, or videos on ESPN or YouTube, the league has to make it possible to fine and/or suspend egregious flopping after the fact. The fact that the refs didn't call it a foul on Cousins is commendable, if only because of the Star power difference (ie: Paul gets the calls more so than Cousins would) but aren't they supposed to be cracking down on flopping this season? Or is that only on flop calls where you are the on-ball defender? I get that you might not always get the call correct at game speed, but if the player knew that the flop would cost him money even after the game then maybe they'd reconsider it. Make the penalties harsh enough and start the suspensions early (after the 2nd flop or something) and they'd really reconsider it. Especially trying it in a playoff game knowing they'd be forced to sit out games that matter more.
 |
choco man Member
|
posted March 21, 2013 10:39 AM
  
Can't standing watching college basketball...clearly inferior product when compared to NBA. I know they are different things. NCAA Football and NFL are different, Div 1 football is great. To ask me to watching college basketball is to ask people to watch WNBA. At least the shot clock is 24 in the WNBA and 30 in Women's ball.
|
MeddlingMage Member
|
posted March 21, 2013 05:37 PM
  
quote: Originally posted by skizzikmonger: Melo who?
Pfft. He was injured. Any team would like to have a Top 10 player on there team. ~MM __________________ Blah, blah, blah werewolf. Smackity-smack not a werewolf. Suspicious of this fruit loop. My vote this round will be for Player X.New keeper of the Logout button
|
skizzikmonger Member
|
posted March 21, 2013 08:34 PM

quote: Originally posted by MeddlingMage: Pfft. He was injured.~MM
Excuses are like ********. Everybody has one. With or without a healthy Melo, the Nuggets were going to blow out the Knicks. quote: Any team would like to have a Top 10 player on there team.
You sure about that?
|
choco man Member
|
posted March 22, 2013 01:30 PM
  
Among the top 10 players you'd draft to start a team, there is a noticeable drop-off in quality. Are the Grizzlies any worse than the Knicks because they don't have a top 10 guy like Melo? And even if they thought they needed a Melo, what would they give up to get a guy like Melo?
|
Kyosukee Member
|
posted March 22, 2013 01:35 PM
  
to be fair, the grizzlies have a a top 20 player in Marc Gasol. Top 15, i'd go as far as to say.
[Edited 1 times, lastly by Kyosukee on March 22, 2013]
|
skizzikmonger Member
|
posted March 22, 2013 04:54 PM

quote: Originally posted by choco man: Among the top 10 players you'd draft to start a team, there is a noticeable drop-off in quality. Are the Grizzlies any worse than the Knicks because they don't have a top 10 guy like Melo? And even if they thought they needed a Melo, what would they give up to get a guy like Melo?
The Grizzlies play defense, which means they don't want a guy who can't, or won't, play defense like Melo. And no they're not any worse than the Knicks. They're better.
|
walkerdog Member
|
posted March 22, 2013 05:14 PM

quote: Originally posted by MeddlingMage: Pfft. He was injured. Any team would like to have a Top 10 player on there team.~MM
The only problem is melo isn't a top 10 player this year (although he certainly was for the first 2 months of the season). Top 10 in PER: RK PLAYER GP MPG TS% AST TO USG ORR DRR REBR PER VA EWA 1 LeBron James, MIA 67 38.3 .627 23.0 9.5 28.2 4.7 21.0 13.2 30.96 784.4 26.1 2 Kevin Durant, OKC 69 38.7 .641 14.9 11.5 27.5 1.8 20.5 11.8 28.02 697.5 23.2 3 Chris Paul, LAC 57 33.2 .598 37.5 8.7 23.4 2.5 10.3 6.5 26.22 429.3 14.3 4 Brook Lopez, BKN 61 30.6 .570 4.8 8.7 25.4 10.8 16.9 13.8 24.98 400.3 13.3 5 Tim Duncan, SA 57 29.8 .555 13.4 10.0 24.2 7.6 29.7 19.4 24.72 335.1 11.2 6 Dwyane Wade, MIA 63 34.7 .574 19.1 10.2 27.0 4.7 12.9 9.0 24.55 458.9 15.3 7 Tony Parker, SA 56 33.0 .595 27.4 9.1 26.9 1.2 9.1 5.4 24.32 366.9 12.2 8 James Harden, HOU 66 38.5 .611 18.9 11.9 27.0 2.5 11.7 7.1 23.80 504.3 16.8 9 Blake Griffin, LAC 67 32.4 .581 17.1 10.4 24.2 8.9 22.6 15.9 23.79 397.8 13.3 10 Russell Westbrook, OKC 69 35.6 .531 22.8 10.4 30.8 4.9 11.5 8.4 23.52 458.3 15.3 Melo is sitting at 13th right now. He's also not one of the best 2 SFs in the league (sorry, LBJ/KD are better), and both of those guys plus Blake trump him at PF (which durant doesn't play a ton, but plays some). I'm obviously being pedantic here, but I think Melo is a really good player, but not a top 10 player until we can see him sustain a couple of season's worth of play at the level he was at the start of the year.
 |
skizzikmonger Member
|
posted March 22, 2013 08:30 PM

And the Nuggets are the 3-seed with tiebreakers over the Clippers and Grizzlies
|
choco man Member
|
posted March 23, 2013 09:53 AM
  
quote: Originally posted by skizzikmonger: And the Nuggets are the 3-seed with tiebreakers over the Clippers and Grizzlies
After just 2 days of that 35-second shot clock league, by now we should know that seeding doesn't matter  Besides if Clips and Grizz are 4-5, Grizz get to have some revenge...as long the flopping of CP3 and Griffin get flagged and they slow down Bledsoe. No nick young/reggie evans shenanigans this year.
|
skizzikmonger Member
|
posted March 23, 2013 01:00 PM

quote: Originally posted by choco man: After just 2 days of that 35-second shot clock league, by now we should know that seeding doesn't matter 
When you're 31-3 at home, it matters
|
choco man Member
|
posted March 23, 2013 02:38 PM
  
quote: Originally posted by skizzikmonger: When you're 31-3 at home, it matters
You're referring to the high altitude, correct?
|
skizzikmonger Member
|
posted March 25, 2013 06:59 PM

Forget home court. The Nuggets need a healthy Ty Lawson for the playoffs.Edit: At least the Grizzlies lost. Everyone stays where they are in the seeding.
[Edited 1 times, lastly by skizzikmonger on March 25, 2013]
|
MeddlingMage Member
|
posted March 25, 2013 08:26 PM
  
quote: Originally posted by skizzikmonger: Excuses are like ********. Everybody has one. With or without a healthy Melo, the Nuggets were going to blow out the Knicks.[B]
That's easy to say in a blowout win without Melo in the line up. quote: Originally posted by walkerdog: [B]The only problem is melo isn't a top 10 player this year (although he certainly was for the first 2 months of the season). Top 10 in PER:RK PLAYER GP MPG TS% AST TO USG ORR DRR REBR PER VA EWA 1 LeBron James, MIA 67 38.3 .627 23.0 9.5 28.2 4.7 21.0 13.2 30.96 784.4 26.1 2 Kevin Durant, OKC 69 38.7 .641 14.9 11.5 27.5 1.8 20.5 11.8 28.02 697.5 23.2 3 Chris Paul, LAC 57 33.2 .598 37.5 8.7 23.4 2.5 10.3 6.5 26.22 429.3 14.3 4 Brook Lopez, BKN 61 30.6 .570 4.8 8.7 25.4 10.8 16.9 13.8 24.98 400.3 13.3 5 Tim Duncan, SA 57 29.8 .555 13.4 10.0 24.2 7.6 29.7 19.4 24.72 335.1 11.2 6 Dwyane Wade, MIA 63 34.7 .574 19.1 10.2 27.0 4.7 12.9 9.0 24.55 458.9 15.3 7 Tony Parker, SA 56 33.0 .595 27.4 9.1 26.9 1.2 9.1 5.4 24.32 366.9 12.2 8 James Harden, HOU 66 38.5 .611 18.9 11.9 27.0 2.5 11.7 7.1 23.80 504.3 16.8 9 Blake Griffin, LAC 67 32.4 .581 17.1 10.4 24.2 8.9 22.6 15.9 23.79 397.8 13.3 10 Russell Westbrook, OKC 69 35.6 .531 22.8 10.4 30.8 4.9 11.5 8.4 23.52 458.3 15.3 Melo is sitting at 13th right now. He's also not one of the best 2 SFs in the league (sorry, LBJ/KD are better), and both of those guys plus Blake trump him at PF (which durant doesn't play a ton, but plays some). I'm obviously being pedantic here, but I think Melo is a really good player, but not a top 10 player until we can see him sustain a couple of season's worth of play at the level he was at the start of the year.
All due respect to your list, there are a few players on there that I would not take over Melo. But you did say this year. But then you say Melo needs to prove it for a few years. So do these guys. Lopez Harden Lopez and Harden are a long way off from being like LeBron, Durant, Wade. Parker has rings, but he can't stay healthy. I would take Melo over him. ~MM __________________ Blah, blah, blah werewolf. Smackity-smack not a werewolf. Suspicious of this fruit loop. My vote this round will be for Player X.New keeper of the Logout button
 |
Kyosukee Member
|
posted March 26, 2013 05:02 AM
  
But that's just a straight ranking from Hollinger's PER, rather then a preference list. It's hard to argue with pure production, provided you believe in the merit of Hollinger's metric.Personally, I wouldn't take Brook over Melo, but for sure I'd take the others here. With the exception of maybe Griffin and Westbrook. edit: actually, I'd still take WB over Melo.
[Edited 1 times, lastly by Kyosukee on March 26, 2013]
|
choco man Member
|
posted March 26, 2013 10:25 AM
  
Even if you don't follow PER, it's difficult to argue against the top tier of PER in any given season (A team of CP3, LBJ, Durant, Lopez, and Duncan is quite an impressive roster). Top tier of PER are probably All-Stars that year and played to at least a top 25 caliber that given season.But just like any other "top 10" list, there are big gaps in the quality of the individual players. LBJ is a top 10 player of all time. How many other of the top 10 PER players are also there (Tim Duncan, past his prime). Clippers and Grizz re-match is coming.
[Edited 1 times, lastly by choco man on March 26, 2013]
|
speechjew Member
|
posted March 26, 2013 11:49 AM

quote: Originally posted by choco man: Even if you don't follow PER, it's difficult to argue against the top tier of PER in any given season (A team of CP3, LBJ, Durant, Lopez, and Duncan is quite an impressive roster). Top tier of PER are probably All-Stars that year and played to at least a top 25 caliber that given season.But just like any other "top 10" list, there are big gaps in the quality of the individual players. LBJ is a top 10 player of all time. How many other of the top 10 PER players are also there (Tim Duncan, past his prime). Clippers and Grizz re-match is coming.
LBJ a top 10 player all time? If he retired tomorrow, he'd be a top 50. Better NBA players, in no particular order: Jordan Magic Kareem Wilt Oscar Robinson Bill Russell Jerry West Shaq Hakeem John Stockton Karl Malone Duncan Bird Kobe Moses Malone Oh, and Julius Erving, who spent 5 seasons in the ABA - imagine 5 young years added to his stat lines. Cases could be made for about a dozen more players - if we're talking All-Time greats. Lebron can get there, but in terms of modern comparisons, he's got a long way to overcome Kobe and Duncan's career achievements.
 |
choco man Member
|
posted March 26, 2013 02:13 PM
  
quote: Originally posted by speechjew: LBJ a top 10 player all time? If he retired tomorrow, he'd be a top 50. Better NBA players, in no particular order: Jordan Magic Kareem Wilt Oscar Robinson Bill Russell Jerry West Shaq Hakeem John Stockton Karl Malone Duncan Bird Kobe Moses Malone Oh, and Julius Erving, who spent 5 seasons in the ABA - imagine 5 young years added to his stat lines. Cases could be made for about a dozen more players - if we're talking All-Time greats. Lebron can get there, but in terms of modern comparisons, he's got a long way to overcome Kobe and Duncan's career achievements.
But imagine 5 more years added to LBJ's stats.... I'm not sure you can make the case for a dozen more players, when you're taking "all-time" a dozen is a whole lot. The thing about Kobe, Mailman, Stockton, Hakeem is that unlike LBJ you couldn't definitively say at any point of their careers they were absolutely the best player in the NBA. And I am a fan of Kobe (the basketball player, not the rapist). I can't say much of the older players because I'm not old enough to have even seen Bird & Magic play. Eventually, the NBA is going to old enough to where the "all-time" list is so big that it's not going to matter if it's top 10 or top 20 or....The biggest difference that will remain is that there will still be a "top tier" (eg Jordan, Russell, etc.) among the top. I think the whole "top list" thing was brought up because discussion of Melo. Who by being on a top ten list, invalidates the usefulness of any top ten list. fwiw, he's top three paid, and that matters to Melo.
 |
speechjew Member
|
posted March 26, 2013 02:27 PM

quote: Originally posted by choco man: The thing about Kobe, Mailman, Stockton, Hakeem is that unlike LBJ you couldn't definitively say at any point of their careers they were absolutely the best player in the NBA. And I am a fan of Kobe (the basketball player, not the rapist).I can't say much of the older players because I'm not old enough to have even seen Bird & Magic play.
and you're saying LBJ is? Depends on your definition of "best." PER? sure. But if I'm building a team, I'd want Chris Paul. But how I'd build an NBA team is different from someone else.
|
junichi Moderator
|
posted March 26, 2013 02:32 PM
  
quote: Originally posted by speechjew: and you're saying LBJ is? Depends on your definition of "best." PER? sure. But if I'm building a team, I'd want Chris Paul. But how I'd build an NBA team is different from someone else.
If I have to build a team from scratch, I would take LBJ over Chris Paul any day of the week, and I don't even like LBJ. If it's between LBJ and Durant, then it would be a coin flip. __________________ Yes, I know. :)
|
speechjew Member
|
posted March 26, 2013 02:39 PM

quote: Originally posted by junichi: If I have to build a team from scratch, I would take LBJ over Chris Paul any day of the week, and I don't even like LBJ.If it's between LBJ and Durant, then it would be a coin flip.
Durant is 2A.
| |