Author
|
Topic: The Post for Magic Stuff #81
|
wayne Member
|
posted June 14, 2013 07:07 AM
  
quote: Originally posted by : Would you do 3 thoughtseize for $130 shipped? They're about to be in M14 so the price should drop...but unfortunately I'd like some for a tournament about a week before m14 releases.
lol, any truth to thoughtseize being reprinted?
|
Sovarius Member
|
posted June 14, 2013 08:03 AM
  
Anyone have a lot of commons on MTGO they'd give/trade to me? I have very little online to trade back but could do paper cards or money.Need white weenies/soldiers, affinity, enchants, elves, infect, slivers, greenpost. Highest priority is enchants then greenpost. My enchants is posted to deck help forum. __________________ Drana, Kalastria Bloodchief, and other vampire females oddities (crimp miscut misprint sign testprint alters etc)My Saleslist Wants
|
stab107 Member
|
posted June 14, 2013 08:58 AM
  
quote: Originally posted by Sovarius: Anyone have a lot of commons on MTGO they'd give/trade to me? I have very little online to trade back but could do paper cards or money.Need white weenies/soldiers, affinity, enchants, elves, infect, slivers, greenpost. Highest priority is enchants then greenpost. My enchants is posted to deck help forum.
I probably have some stuff, let me check later this evening and get back to you. Thoughtseize and mutavault reprints are still unconfirmed near as I can tell. Some guys saying "my source says X" is not confirmation if you ask me.
|
Pail42 Member
|
posted June 14, 2013 12:13 PM

quote: Originally posted by dfitzg88: I have a feeling this would have kept prices from falling as much, which appears to have been the goal.If they had different artwork or symbols, a small percentage of people would value them differently than the batches from RTR/GTC, especially if one artwork looks better. I think the way they did it was best for tanking the prices of shocks.
Did the shocks really "tank" in value due to DGM? City of Guilds Sacred Foundary's have increased in value since the start of RTR block - ~$16 to ~$20. GTC Foundary's pre-ordered for ~$15, hit a peak after release of ~$20 and were at ~$16 before the release of DGM. After DGM they bottomed out at ~$12 and are already trending up at ~$13. Stomping Ground "tanked" from ~$16 to ~$12 with the release of DGM, but it's already back up to ~$15. The price would absolutely be higher if they hadn't given us the bonus 1-2 duals per box, but I don't think "tank" is an accurate description of the way things played out. Price trends from this random website I found on google http://ark42.com/mtg/pricehistory.php?s=Gatecrash&c=Stomping+Ground&d=0
[Edited 1 times, lastly by Pail42 on June 14, 2013]
 |
Pail42 Member
|
posted June 14, 2013 12:34 PM

quote: Originally posted by wayne:
lol, any truth to thoughtseize being reprinted?
The speculation is because it wasn't in Modern Masters and it is an expensive format staple that it will get reprinted soon in some other product.
|
SageShadows Member
|
posted June 14, 2013 03:37 PM
  
quote: Originally posted by Pail42: Did the shocks really "tank" in value due to DGM?City of Guilds Sacred Foundary's have increased in value since the start of RTR block - ~$16 to ~$20. GTC Foundary's pre-ordered for ~$15, hit a peak after release of ~$20 and were at ~$16 before the release of DGM. After DGM they bottomed out at ~$12 and are already trending up at ~$13. Stomping Ground "tanked" from ~$16 to ~$12 with the release of DGM, but it's already back up to ~$15. The price would absolutely be higher if they hadn't given us the bonus 1-2 duals per box, but I don't think "tank" is an accurate description of the way things played out. Price trends from this random website I found on google http://ark42.com/mtg/pricehistory.php?s=Gatecrash&c=Stomping+Ground&d=0
http://blacklotusproject.com/cards/Gatecrash/Sacred+Foundry/ http://blacklotusproject.com/cards/Gatecrash/Stomping+Ground/
|
dfitzg88 Member
|
posted June 14, 2013 08:16 PM

quote: Originally posted by SageShadows: http://blacklotusproject.com/cards/Gatecrash/Sacred+Foundry/ http://blacklotusproject.com/cards/Gatecrash/Stomping+Ground/
i was about to say his prices didnt seem right. this looks like tanking to me. were they 2 different artworks, i don't think this would have happened. on another note, M14 spoiler doesn't seem to support the M10 duals. I'm pretty excited to not see these again, but not too happy about losing 20 foil rares i've had in my collection for years.
|
Zeckk Member
|
posted June 15, 2013 12:20 AM
  
quote: Originally posted by dfitzg88: i was about to say his prices didnt seem right. this looks like tanking to me. were they 2 different artworks, i don't think this would have happened.on another note, M14 spoiler doesn't seem to support the M10 duals. I'm pretty excited to not see these again, but not too happy about losing 20 foil rares i've had in my collection for years.
The upside is that they are still popular for EDH, they see a bit of modern play, and WOTC has made it very clear that they are comfortable with the checklands in multiple standard formats. Even if you don't sell them, I imagine we will see them in standard again in the near future.
|
wayne Member
|
posted June 15, 2013 02:22 AM
  
quote: Originally posted by Zeckk: The upside is that they are still popular for EDH, they see a bit of modern play, and WOTC has made it very clear that they are comfortable with the checklands in multiple standard formats. Even if you don't sell them, I imagine we will see them in standard again in the near future.
Probably time for enemy fastlands or enemy checklands.
|
Pail42 Member
|
posted June 15, 2013 03:33 PM

quote: Originally posted by dfitzg88: i was about to say his prices didnt seem right. this looks like tanking to me. were they 2 different artworks, i don't think this would have happened.
If they were two different artworks the DGM versions would likely be more expensive since they are rarer and (assumption) less packs are getting cracked. While the prices on the sites disagree they both show about a 20% price drop. I guess we have different definitions of tank.
|
dwiz Member
|
posted June 15, 2013 07:38 PM
  
quote: Originally posted by stab107: I probably have some stuff, let me check later this evening and get back to you.Thoughtseize and mutavault reprints are still unconfirmed near as I can tell. Some guys saying "my source says X" is not confirmation if you ask me.
Mutavault is definitely in...
|
dfitzg88 Member
|
posted June 16, 2013 02:54 AM

quote: Originally posted by Pail42: If they were two different artworks the DGM versions would likely be more expensive since they are rarer and (assumption) less packs are getting cracked. While the prices on the sites disagree they both show about a 20% price drop. I guess we have different definitions of tank.
For Hallowed Fountain, pre-RTR, we're talking 25 dollars to buy one. Post-RTR, 12 dollars. Post-DGM, we're looking at a 7 dollar card. I think that if DGM had different artwork, the situation would be different. All I'm saying is the price drop wouldn't have been anywhere near as significant if the two were distinguishable. The "tanking" is obvious, as a playset now runs the former cost of 1 copy prior to their reprinting.
|
Sovarius Member
|
posted June 16, 2013 06:40 AM
  
quote: Originally posted by dfitzg88: For Hallowed Fountain, pre-RTR, we're talking 25 dollars to buy one. Post-RTR, 12 dollars. Post-DGM, we're looking at a 7 dollar card.
pre-RTR it was only the original art in Dissension. So you go on to say it halved in price and halved in price. You're talking about the second art being a $7 card, the original art is still right near $15 Original was low twenties until last year right before RTR, then dipped to a bit above $10 and has now since gone up again. The new art's average a couple months before DGM is like a couple bucks more than it is now. It hasn't "tanked". It went down, sure. I think that the steady price drop is still the fact that shocks get opened a lot more frequently in their original packs through drafting. DGM is not the only supply of them and the somewhat meager quantities it was reprinted in, and the fact that DGM is 1/3 of a draft says to me the reprint is not seriously effecting price, probably no more than 15% __________________ Drana, Kalastria Bloodchief, and other vampire females oddities (crimp miscut misprint sign testprint alters etc)My Saleslist Wants
 |
Pail42 Member
|
posted June 16, 2013 07:04 AM

quote: Originally posted by dfitzg88: All I'm saying is the price drop wouldn't have been anywhere near as significant if the two were distinguishable.
For the Dissention printing of hallowed fountain blp shows the price is down to 13.95 from a high a little over 30. However; That massive price drop came from the RTR release and announcement - not DGM. The art in these two versions is different. If DGM had new art I expect the prices for the original printings to be affected the same amount and the prices for the prices for the DGM and RTR/GTC versions would be slightly higher. This is all assuming the the new art is of similar quality to the old art. For example, if the DGM art was different and generally considered vastly superior then some people would potentially dump their old versions for the new art. quote: Originally posted by dfitzg88: The "tanking" is obvious, as a playset now runs the former cost of 1 copy prior to their reprinting.
That's only true if you compare the all-time high for Dissention Hallowed Fountain ($31 in 2011) to the cheaper RTR all-time low price ($7.50)
 |
TheCottonRapster New Member
|
posted June 16, 2013 09:15 AM

quote: Originally posted by wayne:
How else are they going to move all that core set junk? 
By including cards like Mutavault, Scavenging Ooze, and potentially Thoughtseize at rare.
|
WeedIan Member
|
posted June 16, 2013 09:32 AM
  
quote: Originally posted by TheCottonRapster: By including cards like Mutavault, Scavenging Ooze, and potentially Thoughtseize at rare.
They don't print things that make you damage yourself in core sets anymore. __________________ Member Since 03/28/2001 12000+ posts 1st in posts in Ontario and Canada 9th in posts on MOTL 5th in Refs in Ontario Pushing to get to top 100 in MOTL Refs
[Edited 1 times, lastly by WeedIan on June 16, 2013]
|
rats60 Member
|
posted June 16, 2013 09:42 AM
  
quote: Originally posted by WeedIan: They don't print things that make you damage yourself in core sets anymore.
Do you mean like Sign in Blood? Oh wait, it was in M13. I don't think that they want lands that damage you, but Spells are OK.
|
choco man Member
|
posted June 16, 2013 01:12 PM
  
strictly from a competitive perspective, why would someone play blue tron over r/g tron? or vice versa?
|
Sovarius Member
|
posted June 16, 2013 04:15 PM
  
I like RG because it has pyroclasm and green search effects. Ancient stirrings hits land and chromatics and all the threats.
|
Liq Member
|
posted June 16, 2013 04:39 PM
  
Thinking about entering a local Modern tournament for a box of Modern Masters. Local competition is RWU, Poison and blue Tron. What should I run?__________________ <Jazaray> LIQ! <Jazaray> you broke MOTL <Liq> totally <BoltBait> Don't make me kick you <Slinga> Have no fear, MOTL's janitor is here! <nderdog> So we're all agreed, it's Liq's fault, right? <Leshrac> let me deal with that * Liq has been banned
|
dwiz Member
|
posted June 16, 2013 06:52 PM
  
quote: Originally posted by Liq: Thinking about entering a local Modern tournament for a box of Modern Masters. Local competition is RWU, Poison and blue Tron. What should I run?
If that's the competition, I'd go with Rb burn.
|
SageShadows Member
|
posted June 16, 2013 09:54 PM
  
I feel like there was once a thread for this, but it's now lost, so I'll post here. Anyone interested in testing Legacy on Cockatrice? I have a big local tournament in a few weeks and while I've picked up most of RiP/Helm UW Miracles, I haven't actually played it and would love to brush up on my legacy skills. On that note, any suggestions? I'm not sure what the local meta is right now, so I've been just perusing mtgthesource for some information and maybe I'll read up some reports. EDIT: See the Legacy post at the end of this subforum...
[Edited 1 times, lastly by SageShadows on June 16, 2013]
|
dfitzg88 Member
|
posted June 17, 2013 03:07 AM

quote: Originally posted by Sovarius: pre-RTR it was only the original art in Dissension. So you go on to say it halved in price and halved in price. You're talking about the second art being a $7 card, the original art is still right near $15Original was low twenties until last year right before RTR, then dipped to a bit above $10 and has now since gone up again. The new art's average a couple months before DGM is like a couple bucks more than it is now. It hasn't "tanked". It went down, sure. I think that the steady price drop is still the fact that shocks get opened a lot more frequently in their original packs through drafting. DGM is not the only supply of them and the somewhat meager quantities it was reprinted in, and the fact that DGM is 1/3 of a draft says to me the reprint is not seriously effecting price, probably no more than 15%
Pre Rte shocks weren't standard. They're now standard which would demand a price increase generally. The price to get a shock has tanked. I don't care which version it is. You're separating them. My point has been the price to buy a copy of a shock. It has tanked. If there were a third version, the price wouldn't be as low as it is. I didn't say how much higher, only that it would be counterintuitive to tanking the price.
 |
totalkaoz Member
|
posted June 17, 2013 05:12 PM
  
Is something wrong with the reference system? My refs are still listed about the same but most of them are no longer "MOTL references" - missing usernames though the emails remain.
|
Pail42 Member
|
posted June 17, 2013 05:43 PM

quote: Originally posted by dfitzg88: Pre Rte shocks weren't standard. They're now standard which would demand a price increase generally. The price to get a shock has tanked.
When eternal staples get reprinted in standard the price generally goes down. Price jumps only tend to happen when the card is not an eternal staple. Look at the prices back in Jan 2011 - all printings of the shocklands are more expensive now compared to then. Look at the prices after the Modern format was announced (May 27, 2011) - all the prices shoot through the roof over the next three months.
| |