"Aurelia's Fury deals X damage divided as you choose among any number"

Fury does NOT divide the damage itself, so that rule would apply.

__________________
"He fights you not because you have wronged him, but because you are there."

<@BrassMan> what do you need new tech for?
<@BrassMan> gush is unrestricted

But what about my question regarding regeneration and totem armor?

If i activate the regen ability on a creature with an umbra, then it would be destroyed, they both trigger? then can i somehow save the totem armor?

__________________
Drana, Kalastria Bloodchief, and other vampire females oddities (crimp miscut misprint sign testprint alters etc)

http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?multiverseid=271152

6/15/2010 Say you control a permanent enchanted with an Aura that has totem armor, and the enchanted permanent has gained a regeneration shield. The next time it would be destroyed, you choose whether to apply the regeneration effect or the totem armor effect. The other effect is unused and remains, in case the permanent would be destroyed again.

__________________
"He fights you not because you have wronged him, but because you are there."

<@BrassMan> what do you need new tech for?
<@BrassMan> gush is unrestricted

1/1/2011: If multiple nontoken creatures are put into their owners' graveyards from the battlefield at the same time, the imprint ability will trigger that many times. You put the triggered abilities on the stack in any order, so you'll determine in which order they resolve. However, since exiling those cards is optional, and choosing to exile a card this way causes the previously exiled cards to return to their owners' graveyards, the order generally doesn't matter: You'll wind up with at most one of those cards exiled, and the rest will be in the appropriate graveyards.

__________________
Drana, Kalastria Bloodchief, and other vampire females oddities (crimp miscut misprint sign testprint alters etc)

I play Fathom Mage. Can I graft the +1/+1 counter onto the Mage before Evolve triggers on Experiment One (thus resulting on a counter going on Experiment One as well?)

quote:

---

Originally posted by ryan2754:
I control Experiment One and Llanowar Reborn.

I play Fathom Mage. Can I graft the +1/+1 counter onto the Mage before Evolve triggers on Experiment One (thus resulting on a counter going on Experiment One as well?)

---

Evolve and graft both trigger when a creature enters the battlefield under your control, but evolve will only trigger if that creature has greater power and/or toughness when it comes into play (evolve also makes this check again as it resolves).

quote:

---

Originally posted by ryan2754:
If it makes the check again as it resolves, I can't stack the evolve than graft so the graft occurs first, then evolve makes it's check?

Seems counterintuitive.

---

15/04/2013 Whenever a creature enters the battlefield under your control, check its power and toughness against the power and toughness of the creature with evolve. If neither stat of the new creature is greater, evolve won't trigger at all.

EDH is great, every session leads to a new rules question.

This one concerns Recoup and Blasphemous Act. In short does the mana cost reduction on Blasphemous Act take effect when flashing it back, or do I have to pay the full 8R?

quote:

---

Originally posted by keywacat:
Ciao;

EDH is great, every session leads to a new rules question.

This one concerns Recoup and Blasphemous Act. In short does the mana cost reduction on Blasphemous Act take effect when flashing it back, or do I have to pay the full 8R?

Cheers for another one;
keywacat

---

601.2e The player determines the total cost of the spell. Usually this is just the mana cost...The total cost is the mana cost or alternative cost (as determined in rule 601.2b), plus all additional costs and cost increases, and minus all cost reductions.

Do we both die at the same time?
Does he die first since he's the active player?

quote:

---

Originally posted by psilence6k:
It's my opponents turn and we both have Boros Reckoners in play and are at 10 life. He casts Blasphemous Act... what happens?

Do we both die at the same time?
Does he die first since he's the active player?

Thanks!
Carl

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by psilence6k:
It's my opponents turn and we both have Boros Reckoners in play and are at 10 life. He casts Blasphemous Act... what happens?

Do we both die at the same time?
Does he die first since he's the active player?

Thanks!
Carl

---

Lets go through this APNAP styles (Active Player / Non Active Player)
1) He casts Act
2) Damage is assigned to all creatures which triggers both Boros Reckoners
3) As he is the active player his triggers go on the stack first
4) Then the non-active player's triggers go on the stack (yours)
5) As there is no more triggers to go on the stack the stack starts resolving in the last on, first off order.
6) Your trigger resolves, you get to target the damage from Reckoner where you want (to his head)
7) The damage from your reckoner gets assigned which takes him to -3 life
8) As this trigger has finished resolving priory gets passed (his reckoner's trigger is still on the stack).
9) State Based Effects are checked when ever a player receives priority which means he loses as he's at or below zero life.
10) The game ends with his trigger still on the stack.

__________________
I'm a geek, you're a geek. Let's trade.

quote:

---

Originally posted by AEther Storm:
If you remove a morphed creature from the game (with Astral Slide for example) and it returns to play at eot, it comes back unmorphed. I don't suppose the trigger will occur if that creature has 'when this creature is turned face up, etc..)?

---

I was reading Bennie Smith's article article and was wondering if he was correct about Sundial of the Infinite. In my understanding ending the turn early would simply make your cat tokens go away sooner, or lose the game instantly with Final Fortune.

Is that Sundial of the Infinite causes one to skip the end step as he seems to be writing?

Cheers for it;
keywacat

quote:

---

Originally posted by keywacat:
Ciao all;

I was reading Bennie Smith's article article and was wondering if he was correct about Sundial of the Infinite. In my understanding ending the turn early would simply make your cat tokens go away sooner, or lose the game instantly with Final Fortune.

Is that Sundial of the Infinite causes one to skip the end step as he seems to be writing?

Cheers for it;
keywacat

---

It's all about the timing of the Sundial activation. What you would do is put a trigger of something you don't really want to happen onto the stack, then activate the Sundial. For instance, declare the end of your turn, place the Final Fortune trigger on the stack, then activate the Sundial of the Infinite. As the Sundial resolves, it will remove everything else on the stack including the "you lose the game" trigger and the next person takes over. If you activate the Sundial before you begin your end step, though, you're toast.

__________________
There's no need to fear, UNDERDOG is here!

All your Gruul Nodorogs are belong to me. Trade them to me, please!

Report rules violations.

quote:

---

Originally posted by nderdog:
It's all about the timing of the Sundial activation. What you would do is put a trigger of something you don't really want to happen onto the stack, then activate the Sundial. For instance, declare the end of your turn, place the Final Fortune trigger on the stack, then activate the Sundial of the Infinite. As the Sundial resolves, it will remove everything else on the stack including the "you lose the game" trigger and the next person takes over. If you activate the Sundial before you begin your end step, though, you're toast.

---