Note: This is an archived topic. It is read-only.
  Magic Online Trading League Bulletin Board
  Noteworthy Topics
  Need a Ruling?.. Come on in!.. Pt. 6 (Page 2)

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone!

profile | register | preferences | faq | rules | memberlist | search


This topic is 12 pages long: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12 
This topic was originally posted in this forum: Magic Discussion
Author Topic:   Need a Ruling?.. Come on in!.. Pt. 6
pgw1956
Member
posted February 12, 2001 08:22 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for pgw1956   Click Here to Email pgw1956     
Goblin Game in Planeshift. You have to hide items. If I open up a bag of M&Ms, does that count as one item or does each M&M count as an item?


Cloud
Member
posted February 12, 2001 11:05 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Cloud   Click Here to Email Cloud     
Now i know the answer to this question but I want back up on it so people can stop getting into this same stupid argument everytime it comes up:

Bottomless Pit/The Rack

**for arguments sake, lets forget that the rack has been ERRATED! to say beginning of draw step.

When I say done with the 2 cards in play, it'll go into the opponents untap-upkeep phases. now as the active player the opponent can do anything from draw with tome, ancestral, etc etc. because he has priority. But what really ticks me off is that most people think that they can control MY! effects during his upkeep. So for purposes of staying alive he'll say I'll take rack damage and then the pit. So then I politely mention that they are my effect and he has no control over them, then the argument begins!

So please, to either enlighten me or back me up, am I right on this?

[Edited 1 times, lastly by Cloud on February 12, 2001]


RaZoRsEdGe
Member
posted February 12, 2001 02:41 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for RaZoRsEdGe   Click Here to Email RaZoRsEdGe     
I have a couple questions.

1. Skizzik, someone told me that even after kicker is paid the first round it dies the next at end of turn. I argued that to be incorrect, am I right or am I wrong?(this wasnt a tournament game, it was during an arena game)

2.Phyrexian Infiltrator. The timing on that can be played like this right?. Pay the activation cost, swap creatures, but as a fast effect target the infiltrator itself and swap back again gaining the first creature target on the stack and still controling the infiltrator right?


LMK thanks


Selvaxri
Member
posted February 12, 2001 04:55 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Selvaxri   Click Here to Email Selvaxri     
if a kicker creature comes into play via; Oath of Druids, Defense of the Heart, Pattern of Rebirth or Call of the Wild, can i still pay the kicker? lmk
-Selvaxri


Aya Brea
Member
posted February 12, 2001 05:28 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Aya Brea   Click Here to Email Aya Brea     
Zahmet: You can cast Terminate, and it will deal no damage to the attacker

pgw1956: If the bag has already been open, you'll count all that are in the bag. Same happened to my friend when he hid an open box of one hundred sleeves.

Cloud: I believe that The Rack says target, and you are controling the damage

RaZoRsEdGe: 1. The Skizzik will always stay in play, until it is removed.

2. No, you must swap one for one, also you can't target Infiltrator, since you still control it on the stack.

Selvaxri: No, since the card is being put into play by an effect. Kicker may only be paid when you are casting the card.

__________________
See you space cowboy...
Easy come, easy go

Isn't Aisha cute =^_^=

Contact me at:
Email:
Asuka2099@hotmail.com
ICQ: 55985384

Master of the Anime Guru Master

[Edited 1 times, lastly by Aya Brea on February 12, 2001]


Fireballman
Member
posted February 12, 2001 05:46 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Fireballman   Click Here to Email Fireballman     
can i bounce a derm back into my hand with a shivan wurm via gateing?

__________________
<font size=1></font>

[Edited 1 times, lastly by Fireballman on February 12, 2001]


Warlord X
Member
posted February 12, 2001 05:49 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Warlord X   Click Here to Email Warlord X     
I can answer the last one.

The Shivan Wurm's ability is not targeted, so you can choose any creature as long as it is the appropriate color, in this case, red or green. So yes, Blastoderm is a perfectly legal target.

__________________
"Quick man, inject me with a Lotus, I am getting a tolerance to the cheap crap." -Cardboard Crack Addict

For help with your cardboard crack addiction, call 1-800-WARLORD and I will be happy to tell you my address so I can relieve you of your problem.

Aya Brea
Member
posted February 12, 2001 07:47 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Aya Brea   Click Here to Email Aya Brea     
Even though he answered, here's the thing from the Planeshift FAQ

- The gating triggered ability doesn't target anything, so it's perfectly
fine to return an untargetable card you control (or a card with the right
kind of protection) to its owner's hand.

guenhwyvar: Thank you. I have read the Planeshift FAQ, and I see that you factor it all in.



[Edited 1 times, lastly by Aya Brea on February 12, 2001]


gzeiger
Member
posted February 12, 2001 08:19 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for gzeiger   Click Here to Email gzeiger     
Aya Brea - I think you misunderstood Cloud's question. The controller of the Rack controls the effect, and the damage, but doesn't get to assign its place on the stack. All upkeep triggered effects controlled by the active player are placed on the stack, then effects controlled by the other player, but the active player gets to choose the order, right?

__________________
email me at gzeiger@hotmail.com

Come join the Type 1 Apprentice league (we play Extended too): http://www.magictraders.com/ubb/Forum12/HTML/001696.html

Cloud
Member
posted February 12, 2001 08:22 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Cloud   Click Here to Email Cloud     
Selvaxri> you cannot pay kicker cost on creatures that you do not pay the cc for. Kicker says pay this in addition to the cc such and such an effect occurs. Since you don't pay the cc you have no opportunity to pay kicker.


Aya Brea
Member
posted February 12, 2001 08:24 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Aya Brea   Click Here to Email Aya Brea     
Ok, I understand now. The person who has the current upkeep uses all the effect he has control of, then the opponents effect will go into effect. The only way an opponents effect can go first, is if it say at the beginning of the upkeep, like the Oaths. So basically, if the person wants to assign the damage before the discard, he may do that.

[Edited 1 times, lastly by Aya Brea on February 12, 2001]


reinhart
Member
posted February 12, 2001 08:31 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for reinhart     
if I cast Disrupt and the mana is paid, and a draw a counterspell, can I use the newly drawn counterspell immediately?

If someone casts Aura Blast on my fires, and i sac the fires to pump something, does the Aura Blast let the caster draw a card still?

__________________
Looking for someone to play Apprentice with?


Aya Brea
Member
posted February 12, 2001 08:35 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Aya Brea   Click Here to Email Aya Brea     
reinhart: 1. Yes you can, since the card has been drawn, and the spell is still on the stack

2. If you sac your Fires, the Blast has no more of a legal target, and the spell will fizzel, causing no card draw.

gzeiger
Member
posted February 12, 2001 08:49 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for gzeiger   Click Here to Email gzeiger     
quote:
Originally posted by Aya Brea:
Ok, I understand now. The person who has the current upkeep uses all the effect he has control of, then the opponents effect will go into effect. The only way an opponents effect can go first, is if it say at the beginning of the upkeep, like the Oaths. So basically, if the person wants to assign the damage before the discard, he may do that.

Maybe we should wait for Coolio on this one Nearly every effect I can think of has received errata making it trigger at the beginning of the upkeep. However, this does not change the fact that the active player decides in what order these triggers go on the stack.

__________________
email me at gzeiger@hotmail.com

Come join the Type 1 Apprentice league (we play Extended too): http://www.magictraders.com/ubb/Forum12/HTML/001696.html

guenhwyvar
Member
posted February 12, 2001 11:19 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for guenhwyvar     
Bottomless Pit:
Info: Color=Black Type=Enchantment Cost=1BB SH(U1)
Text(SH+errata): At the beginning of each player's upkeep, that player
discards a card at random from his or her hand. [Oracle 99/05/01]
The ability is controlled by the player who controls Bottomless Pit.

The Rack:
Info: Color=Artifact Type=Artifact Cost=1 AQ(U3)/R4(U1)
Text(4th+errata): As ~this~ comes into play, choose target opponent. ; At
the beginning of the chosen player's draw step, ~this~ deals X damage to
that player where X is the number of cards in his or her hand fewer than
three. [Oracle 99/09/03]
You choose one opposing player on casting and it only affects that one
player. This target is not changed even if this card changes controllers.
It becomes useless but stays in play if the target player leaves play.
[Duelist Magazine #4, Page 64] See Rule M.1.3.
Amount of damage is determined when effect is resolved and not when it is
announced. [D'Angelo 95/10/05]

The bottomless pit happens at the begging of the upkeep and the rack happens at the beginning of the draw step.
This is a pointless argument in this case, however the ruling proposed is itself is fairly important. Who decides what goes on the stack when?


A.4.8 - If multiple triggered abilities are being placed on the stack at
one time, ones controlled by the current player go on the stack first, in
any order that player chooses. Then ones controlled by the other player,
in any order that player chooses. [CompRules 99/04/23]

So in the above case you COULD make them take additional rack damage if the cards were not following current errata. And isn't that what this is all about? Doing more damage...

__________________
-Guenhwyvar
Member of G.A.B Blue Team
and Judge in training.


gzeiger
Member
posted February 12, 2001 11:29 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for gzeiger   Click Here to Email gzeiger     
Thanks Gwenhwyvar, that clears it up

I have another question. Does a state-based effect like Blood Moon (all non-basic lands are Mountains) negate coming into play triggers? There are two cases: the Visions double lands that require returning a land to your hand, and come-into-play-tapped lands. I'm pretty sure the errata on the former mean you still have to return a basic land to your hand, but I'm not so sure about the second case.

Zahmet
unregistered
posted February 13, 2001 03:40 AM           
That wasen't my question...
I was asking if the attacking 2/2 does dmg. to the defending player if it first is blocked and then terminated.


Pandemonium
Member
posted February 13, 2001 11:17 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Pandemonium   Click Here to Email Pandemonium     
Although I am not supposed to post here, I would like to point out you got both of razorsedges questions wrong. For the first I think what he was talking about was in two different rounds. I am not sure as he was not very clear. For the other question, there is a way to do what he is getting at. Target one of your own creatures with the phrexian infiltrator and in response targetting an opponnents creature to hand your opponent the first creature and retain the phyrexian infiltrator.


Aya Brea
Member
posted February 13, 2001 11:21 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Aya Brea   Click Here to Email Aya Brea     
gzeiger: The effects of the cards like the taplands and the Vision lands, still will resolve. It happens when you put it into play, then Blood Moon will resolve.



DarkDamion
Member
posted February 13, 2001 11:39 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for DarkDamion   Click Here to Email DarkDamion     
quote:
Originally posted by Cloud:
Now i know the answer to this question but I want back up on it so people can stop getting into this same stupid argument everytime it comes up:

Bottomless Pit/The Rack

**for arguments sake, lets forget that the rack has been ERRATED! to say beginning of draw step.

When I say done with the 2 cards in play, it'll go into the opponents untap-upkeep phases. now as the active player the opponent can do anything from draw with tome, ancestral, etc etc. because he has priority. But what really ticks me off is that most people think that they can control MY! effects during his upkeep. So for purposes of staying alive he'll say I'll take rack damage and then the pit. So then I politely mention that they are my effect and he has no control over them, then the argument begins!

So please, to either enlighten me or back me up, am I right on this?


Lol, that wouldnt be that big arguement that you got into when you came down here was it?


Anywayz I got a question. I think I know the awnser to it, but I need a postive anwser on it. Ok, can I return a City of Traitors to my hand if I play a Triland, or does it die first. I think it dies first, but I may be wrong. LMK

__________________
Stickdeath 4 life!

My Refs
Email: darkdamion@hotmail.com


guenhwyvar
Member
posted February 13, 2001 01:01 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for guenhwyvar     
Aya Brea:

T.8.12 - A continuous effect affects permanents as soon as they enter play.
For example, if Blood Moon is in play and a non-basic land is played,
the land enters play as a Mountain. It does not enter play as its
original type and then change. [CompRules 99/04/23]

This means that cards like salt marsh would come into play as untapped mountains. However, the visions lands would come into play tapped due to specific rulings on those cards.

Karoo:
Info: Color=Land Type=Land Cost=None VI(U1)
Text(VI+errata): ~this~ comes into play tapped. ; If ~this~ would come into
play, return an untapped plains you control to its owner's hand instead.
If you do, put ~this~ into play. If you don't, put it into its owner's
graveyard. ; {Tap}: Add {W} and one colorless mana to your mana pool.
[Oracle 00/02/01]

You must return a plains to play it, and then when it does come into play it would enter as a mountain.

__________________
-Guenhwyvar
Member of G.A.B Blue Team
and Judge in training.


DeathTyrant
Member
posted February 13, 2001 01:05 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for DeathTyrant   Click Here to Email DeathTyrant     
can i turn all my creatures into "enchantments" with conspiracy so they become affected by cards such as disencant and sterling grove?

__________________
"Well. . . you'll have plenty of time to live in a van down by the river when. . . you're. . . LIVIN' IN A VAN DOWN BY THE RIVER!"
-Chris Farley as Matt Foley, Saturday Night Live.


gzeiger
Member
posted February 13, 2001 01:45 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for gzeiger   Click Here to Email gzeiger     
Gwenhwyvar already answered that one You can't say "enchantment" because of the rule below:

K.11.7 - If you are asked to choose a creature type, you do not have to choose a creature type which already exists in the game. You can make up your own type, such as Platypus, if you choose. This type can only have one word. You may not choose a name which has another meaning in the game, such as "opponent" or "land". Also, slanderous, obscene, and otherwise offensive choices are considered poor sportsmanship and may cause ejection from a tournament. [CompRules 99/04/23] You can choose any creature type that exists on any Magic card in existance. You cannot choose the name of a card in Magic (unless that name is also a creature type), or any word that is in the glossary of the comprehensive rules or is otherwise used to mean something special under the rules. [bethmo 99/11/30]

__________________
email me at gzeiger@hotmail.com

Come join the Type 1 Apprentice league (we play Extended too): http://www.magictraders.com/ubb/Forum12/HTML/001696.html

DeathTyrant
Member
posted February 13, 2001 01:54 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for DeathTyrant   Click Here to Email DeathTyrant     
ok, as another added thought about conspiracy, can i use "wall"?

__________________
"Well. . . you'll have plenty of time to live in a van down by the river when. . . you're. . . LIVIN' IN A VAN DOWN BY THE RIVER!"
-Chris Farley as Matt Foley, Saturday Night Live.


gzeiger
Member
posted February 13, 2001 02:01 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for gzeiger   Click Here to Email gzeiger     
Wall is a creature type. You can do that. But why

__________________
email me at gzeiger@hotmail.com

Come join the Type 1 Apprentice league (we play Extended too): http://www.magictraders.com/ubb/Forum12/HTML/001696.html

This topic is 12 pages long: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12 

All times are PDT (US)

This is an ARCHIVED topic. You may not reply to it!
Hop to:

Contact Us | MOTL Home Page

© 1996-2012 Magic Online Trading League

Powered by Infopop © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47e