Author
|
Topic: Rulings Thread Part 46 (ALL rules-related questions go HERE!)
|
JasonX-NL Member
|
posted September 02, 2010 12:38 AM
quote: Originally posted by Meddling Pimp: Yes
Well, that clears things up Anyway, it's because the Kitchen Finks are exiled and return, which makes the game treat it as a new object. And a 'new' Kitchen Finks doesn't come in play with a persist counter on it. That's why Blink is fun with a lot of other cards with 'enters the battlefield' effects.
|
Meddling Pimp Member
|
posted September 02, 2010 06:02 AM
quote: Originally posted by JasonX-NL: Well, that clears things up
LOL, yeah I was in a hurry but wanted to give an answer in case it was needed quickly. :-)
|
sagabegin Member
|
posted September 02, 2010 04:54 PM
For the pyromancer ascension deck,let's say the ascension is active. Can you call to mind X card in your yard and have the copy target the call to mind just cast? That doesn't work does it? You would need an additional call to mind in the graveyard to make this work right?
|
Meddling Pimp Member
|
posted September 02, 2010 04:55 PM
quote: Originally posted by sagabegin: For the pyromancer ascension deck,let's say the ascension is active. Can you call to mind X card in your yard and have the copy target the call to mind just cast? That doesn't work does it? You would need an additional call to mind in the graveyard to make this work right?
No, that does not work. The Call to Mind wouldn't be in the graveyard until it finishes resolving.
|
gcowhsu Member
|
posted September 02, 2010 05:28 PM
If I attack with Scion of the Ur-Dragon and use his ability to get a dragon with first strike or double strike, Can i use it again after first strike is done to get a bigger dragon to do normal combat damage?
|
thror Member
|
posted September 02, 2010 05:47 PM
quote: Originally posted by gcowhsu: If I attack with Scion of the Ur-Dragon and use his ability to get a dragon with first strike or double strike, Can i use it again after first strike is done to get a bigger dragon to do normal combat damage?
The short answer is no. The object (scion) already did combat damage in the first strike step, so unless he STILL has double strike, he will not do combat damage in the regular damage step. Even though his characteristics changed, he is the same object as before.
|
caquaa Member
|
posted September 02, 2010 06:41 PM
quote: Originally posted by gcowhsu: If I attack with Scion of the Ur-Dragon and use his ability to get a dragon with first strike or double strike, Can i use it again after first strike is done to get a bigger dragon to do normal combat damage?
fyi, he doesn't retain the ability. Once it resolves thats it for that turn
|
mattw Member
|
posted September 04, 2010 02:04 AM
I told my friends this was a rule cause smart people (mab and wcfmo) said so. Is there a link i could show them to just say "here it is, now shssss) "No, if it is a legal blocker you can sacrifice it before it gets dealt damage and take no damage yourself."
|
MAB_Rapper Member
|
posted September 04, 2010 04:34 AM
This link has all the rules changes that started with M10: http://www.wizards.com/magic/magazine/article.aspx?x=mtg/daily/feature/42aThis should be able to answer the question. If not, I'll dig around through some stuff a local judge has written for MTG Salvation's Cranial Insertion to see if I can find anything. __________________ MOTL's Most Likely to Play in the Pro Tour - Three Years Running for 2007, 2008, and 2009 (My Nationals) Cracking the Top 100 Ref Count - 4/1/10 (Currently #91)
[Edited 1 times, lastly by MAB_Rapper on September 04, 2010]
|
AGO Member
|
posted September 04, 2010 11:26 AM
can i use higure, the stil wind to search my library for a shapesharer
|
mattw Member
|
posted September 04, 2010 12:38 PM
That link was just about damage not using the stack really. As informative as it was it didn't cover what would happen if say, there was just one attacker and one blocker. The blocker is declared during the declare blockers step, then suppose it is unsommoned or terror'd or in the case last night, sacrificed. It makes sense to me that the creature is still technically considered blocked and therefore wouldn't deal the defending player any damage. I was hoping for something in that link to clearly say that. Just saying it like this to him isn't convincing enough apparently so i was hoping for proof i guess you could call it. As for Ago, I say yes. The shapesharer is all creature types at all times. Whether it be in the graveyard or your library. The official rules for changeling are as follows:
502.73. Changeling 502.73a Changeling is a characteristic-defining ability. "Changeling" means "This object is every creature type." This ability works in all zones. See rule 405.2. 502.73b Multiple instances of changeling on the same object are redundant. * Because a card with changeling is every creature type, it will be affected by any spell or ability that affects any creature type, regardless of what that creature type is. And because changeling is a characteristic-defining ability, this is true in all zones. For example, if a card tells you to reveal a Merfolk card from your hand, return a Goblin card from your graveyard to your hand, or gain control of a Goat, you can perform these actions on a card with changeling. * The rules that govern the interaction of continuous effects state that type-changing effects are applied before effects that add or remove abilities. This causes some unusual things to happen. -- If an effect causes a creature with changeling to lose all creature types, the creature won't lose changeling -- but it will lose all its creature types. -- If an effect causes a creature with changeling to become a new creature type or types, the creature won't lose changeling -- but it won't have all creature types anymore. It will be just the new creature type(s). -- If a card loses the changeling ability, it will still have all creature types. It just won't have changeling. * Note that effects that grant an object all creature types do *not* give that object changeling.
[Edited 1 times, lastly by mattw on September 04, 2010]
|
caquaa Member
|
posted September 04, 2010 12:42 PM
mattw:
510.1d. A blocking creature assigns combat damage to the creatures it’s blocking. If it isn’t currently blocking any creatures (if, for example, they were destroyed or removed from combat), it assigns no combat damage. If it’s blocking exactly one creature, it assigns all its combat damage to that creature. If it’s blocking two or more creatures, it assigns its combat damage to those creatures according to the damage assignment order announced for it. This may allow the blocking creature to divide its combat damage. However, it can’t assign combat damage to a creature that it’s blocking unless each creature that precedes that blocked creature is assigned lethal damage. When checking for assigned lethal damage, take into account damage already marked on the creature and damage from other creatures that’s being assigned during the same combat damage step, but not any abilities or effects that might change the amount of damage that’s actually dealt. An amount of damage that’s greater than a creature’s lethal damage may be assigned to it.
this is from the comp rules, linked on the front page. Keep in mind that trample will modify this rule, in case that comes up. AGO: 702.70a. Changeling is a characteristic-defining ability. “Changeling” means “This object is every creature type.” This ability works everywhere, even outside the game. See rule 604.3 its a ninja while its in your deck as well.
[Edited 2 times, lastly by caquaa on September 04, 2010]
|
mattw Member
|
posted September 04, 2010 12:47 PM
thx dude
|
Justyn20003 Member
|
posted September 04, 2010 09:42 PM
Hi, three questions.Omnath, Locus of Mana + Birds of Paradise. If you have the birds produce Green mana like a Llanowar elves would it stay? Omnath, Locus Of Mana + Devoted Druid + Quillspike If you were to do the quillspike combo with on the field is the devoted's grees "Consumed" and gone or is it stil there so Omnath would keep it around? Final Question! And it's about EDH. So I'm not really solid on edh rules, or lack there of, If you used my personal favorite Nicol Bolas as a "General" do you have to pay his "Upkeep" cost of UBR? Or becasue he's a general that doesn't apply?
Thanks!
|
MAB_Rapper Member
|
posted September 07, 2010 05:07 AM
Omnath, Locus of Mana + Birds of Paradise. If you have the birds produce Green mana like a Llanowar elves would it stay? - YesOmnath, Locus Of Mana + Devoted Druid + Quillspike If you were to do the quillspike combo with on the field is the devoted's grees "Consumed" and gone or is it stil there so Omnath would keep it around? - If the mana was never used, the Onmath will keep the mana around. In this case, you are tapping for a green and using the Green to essentially untap Druid and get another green, so Onmath will have no mana to keep. Final Question! And it's about EDH. So I'm not really solid on edh rules, or lack there of, If you used my personal favorite Nicol Bolas as a "General" do you have to pay his "Upkeep" cost of UBR? Or becasue he's a general that doesn't apply? - You will have to pay the UBR cost each turn. If you don't, he will be sacrificed and you will need to recast him.
__________________ MOTL's Most Likely to Play in the Pro Tour - Three Years Running for 2007, 2008, and 2009 (My Nationals) Cracking the Top 100 Ref Count - 4/1/10 (Currently #91)
|
iccarus Member
|
posted September 07, 2010 06:23 PM
If I sac a Reveillark to Greater Good, do I get to choose whether I draw/discard or return creatures first? (the ordering portion of this question does actually matter, even if the second half of the post is correct)I'm guessing the order won't really make much of a difference anyway though. Wouldn't the targets for the lark trigger need to already be in the graveyard at the time I sac it to activate GG and the ability goes on the stack? __________________ Wisconsin - smells like dairy air!
|
JoshSherman Member
|
posted September 07, 2010 06:30 PM
quote: Originally posted by iccarus: If I sac a Reveillark to Greater Good, do I get to choose whether I draw/discard or return creatures first? (the ordering portion of this question does actually matter, even if the second half of the post is correct)I'm guessing the order won't really make much of a difference anyway though. Wouldn't the targets for the lark trigger need to already be in the graveyard at the time I sac it to activate GG and the ability goes on the stack?
No, you cannot choose what order this happens in. This is how it works: 1)You pay Greater Good's cost (sac'ing Reveillark) to put its ability on the stack. At this point, whatever you want to retun with Reveillark has to already be in the 'yard. 2)Reveillark triggers, and it's ability will be placed on the stack the next time a player would get priority above the Greater Good trigger.
[Edited 1 times, lastly by JoshSherman on September 07, 2010]
|
iccarus Member
|
posted September 07, 2010 06:54 PM
Thanks. That's what I thought, but wanted to verify it.__________________ Wisconsin - smells like dairy air!
|
DeMoNiC DuNcE Member
|
posted September 08, 2010 01:06 PM
If my opponent casts Journey to Nowhere on a creature I control, then plays Meddling Mage and names that creature, and then Journey to Nowhere leaves play, what happens to my creature?
|
Jazaray Moderator
|
posted September 08, 2010 01:43 PM
quote: Originally posted by DeMoNiC DuNcE: If my opponent casts Journey to Nowhere on a creature I control, then plays Meddling Mage and names that creature, and then Journey to Nowhere leaves play, what happens to my creature?
Meddling Mage has been errata'd to say that the card can't be CAST. It can still however, be "Put onto the battlefield" by a spell or an ability. Thanks, Jazaray
__________________ A Plastered Dragon Original Limerick: There was a nice lassie named Jaz Many wished to have what she has, A delicate face, A soft warm embrace, And a whole lot of bedroom pizzazz.WeedIan: Jazaray is like MOTL's Mom. Have dinner with Jaz
|
yakusoku Member
|
posted September 08, 2010 01:44 PM
quote: Originally posted by DeMoNiC DuNcE: If my opponent casts Journey to Nowhere on a creature I control, then plays Meddling Mage and names that creature, and then Journey to Nowhere leaves play, what happens to my creature?
Journey to Nowhere's trigger goes on the stack and returns your creature to the battlefield. You aren't casting the creature so Meddling Mage does nothing. Contrast this to your opponent playing Meddling Mage naming your creature and then playing Wipe Away on your creature. You will be unable to cast that creature as long as Meddling Mage is on the battlefield.
|
saintjust21 Banned
|
posted September 10, 2010 06:51 PM
okay i just got into a dispute with my friend over this, any help would be greatly appreciated.scenario is this. player a has the following in play: ambush commander, 5 forests. player a declares he is attacking with all 5 forests and his ambush commander. player b accepts all damage from attacking creatures and the ambush commander. player a then sacrifices the 5 forests to give his ambush commander +3/+3 until end of turn for each forest sacrificed. the dispute is this. sacrificing a creature from an abilities goes on the stack and happens before damage is dealt to a player or creature, henceforth the 5 forests would never deal damage from attacking and would instead be sacrificed to the ambush commanders ability. player a is claiming that it is allowed to attack to deal combat damage with the 5 forests and the ambush commander then sacrifice the 5 forests to the commander to deal an addition +3/+3 per forest. help please, i just need a clarification, im pretty sure this cannot be done.
|
Timmyhill Member
|
posted September 10, 2010 08:35 PM
why cant you use a sacrifce ability in response to your opponent sacrificeing something?
|
CubFan81 Member
|
posted September 10, 2010 08:51 PM
quote: Originally posted by saintjust21: this cannot be done.
This was the gist of the new combat rules changes. Combat damage no longer uses the stack and happens all at once. He cannot have the "Forest" deal their damage before the Ambush Commander and then sacrifice them to pump the Commander. After Player B declares no blockers, Player A has a chance to play effects or abilities. If he chooses not to then you move on and all damage is dealt at once. If he does decide to use the Commander's ability and sacrifice some number of the "Forest/Elves" to pump his Commander then they are no longer around when you move on to deal damage and they therefore cannot deal any damage.
|
MeddlingMage Member
|
posted September 11, 2010 07:41 AM
quote: Originally posted by Jazaray: Meddling Mage has been errata'd to say that the card can't be CAST. It can still however, be "Put onto the battlefield" by a spell or an ability. Thanks, Jazaray
Yes, and it hurt. I feel so violated... ~MM __________________ I am MeddlingMage...YOUR Motl Survivor 11 Champion and 2007 Captain N award winner.MafiaBass (9:48:50 PM): sorry my keyboard is sticky MeddlingEric (9:48:56 PM): ewwww MafiaBass (9:51:43 PM): FTR, I did not show you my e-pee-pee New keeper of the Logout button
| |