Author
|
Topic: Innistrad Spoiler!
|
mtglover Member
|
posted September 02, 2011 08:45 AM
  
does it mean that the new garruk doesn't leave play when he has 0 loyalty counters on him?
|
stab107 Member
|
posted September 02, 2011 08:57 AM

No. The base loyalty was likely not printed on the flip side to prevent confusion regarding how many loyalty Garruk should have upon transformation (ie; the number of counters that are on him before/after he flips should be consistent). He is still a PW and therefore follows the game rules that apply to PWs regardless of which face is in play.
[Edited 1 times, lastly by stab107 on September 02, 2011]
|
Goaswerfraiejen Member
|
posted September 02, 2011 09:07 AM

quote: Originally posted by stab107: Definitely not feeling the new Garruk. The horror theme is there in the form of Wolves but how can a relentless Garruk produce weaker creatures than a normal/primal Garruk? That doesn't feel particularly relentless. This one may be a miss but there is so much sweet stuff going on elsewhere in this set. Rooftop Storm just oozes flavor, I love it!
What's 'relentless' about it is that it costs him zero loyalty... he can therefore produce wolves in perpetuity, i.e. relentlessly.
I really like this incarnation of Garruk, even if it's not likely to hit Legacy (the only format I play). It's just too bad that pre-orders on ebay are already hitting $160 for 4x, since I'd love to be able to play around with him more casually. __________________ "I have heard the mermaids singing, each to each. I do not think they will sing to me." -T.S. EliotRIP Ari Legacy UGB River Rock primer. PM comments/questions. Info on grad school in Phil.
|
coasterdude84 Member
|
posted September 02, 2011 09:48 AM
  
quote: Originally posted by Goaswerfraiejen:
I really like this incarnation of Garruk, even if it's not likely to hit Legacy (the only format I play). It's just too bad that pre-orders on ebay are already hitting $160 for 4x, since I'd love to be able to play around with him more casually.
I agree, but I think it's just planeswalker hype. Ever since Jace got stupid, folks are worried about missing out on the next big walker. Liliana is currently pre-selling in that same range as Garruk. I think both will come down.
|
Kyosukee Member
|
posted September 02, 2011 10:39 AM

It's for this reason that if a planeswalker ever drops under 10, I pick up a playset. Just in case.Which is why I never got a playset of mind sculptors. I'm so glad I dumped my elspeths at peak though. Best. Move. Ever. Edit: Except Chandra ablaze. Forget that card. ._. __________________ What a willou tree thinks about.
[Edited 1 times, lastly by Kyosukee on September 02, 2011]
|
gcowhsu Member
|
posted September 02, 2011 10:51 AM
  
The difference is that Jace and Elspeth are good cards. Jace basically wins the game when he enters play and Elspeth has great abilities that add loyalty. New Garruk is either a Green lightning bolt or just another breeding pit. I don't like that his abilities do not gain loyalty. I also don't like that his ult is basically his first ult with a possible bigger X.
|
hilikuS Member
|
posted September 02, 2011 11:52 AM
  
quote: Originally posted by gcowhsu: The difference is that Jace and Elspeth are good cards. Jace basically wins the game when he enters play and Elspeth has great abilities that add loyalty. New Garruk is either a Green lightning bolt or just another breeding pit. I don't like that his abilities do not gain loyalty. I also don't like that his ult is basically his first ult with a possible bigger X.
I think maybe you're simplifying things a bit too much. His first ability isn't a bolt, if anything it would be an Arena, or if you're making the comparison to Bolt, then it's a green Strafe. It doesn't just die though after you use that ability. You can take out a little dude, and flip him. You can waste him if you need to, and deal 3. Breeding Pit has an upkeep cost, and doesn't give you 2/2s. The new Garruk gives you a creature each turn for free (after casting him). Which is built in protection for Garruk, and nice in and of itself. If you get him to flip, he gives you Deathtouch dudes (which BTW are nasty with his ultimate, and the new rules for Trample), or he lets you pop one of your tokens, for any creature in the deck. Not to sound like a jerk here, but it's really hard to say this guy is just a Strafe and a Breeding Pit. Even if it was, it's still both at the same time.
[Edited 1 times, lastly by hilikuS on September 02, 2011]
 |
coasterdude84 Member
|
posted September 02, 2011 01:26 PM
  
quote: Originally posted by hilikuS: ... and the new rules for Trample...
Did I miss something? What are the new rules for Trample?
|
nderdog Moderator
|
posted September 02, 2011 01:38 PM
  
quote: Originally posted by coasterdude84: Did I miss something? What are the new rules for Trample?
I assume he's referring to the rules with deathtouch and trample where you only need to assign one point of damage regardless of toughness. __________________ There's no need to fear, UNDERDOG is here!All your Gruul Nodorogs are belong to me. Trade them to me, please! Report rules violations. Remember the Auctions Board!
|
CubFan81 Member
|
posted September 02, 2011 02:42 PM
  
quote: Originally posted by nderdog: I assume he's referring to the rules with deathtouch and trample where you only need to assign one point of damage regardless of toughness.
Are we sure this is correct? I'm almost certain that you still need to assign full damage before any trample damage carries over. ie: My 5/5 trample with deathtouch is blocked by his two 2/2s. There would be 2 damage to each creature and 1 trample damage. __________________ PMs don't work in Chrome or Firefox 4.0+, see HERE for work arounds.
|
caquaa Member
|
posted September 02, 2011 03:24 PM
  
quote: Originally posted by CubFan81:
ie: My 5/5 trample with deathtouch is blocked by his two 2/2s. There would be 2 damage to each creature and 1 trample damage.
you're only required to assign lethal damage to the creatures. With deathtouch 1 damage is lethal damage.
|
AtriumXP Member
|
posted September 02, 2011 03:26 PM

He's correct. It happened in M10.You only have to assign "lethal damage", which in the new ruling on Deathtouch, is "at least one point of damage". You can still choose to put in more (like if you thought your opponent could prevent a point of damage or something). __________________ Check my List! **I send in bubble mailer + top loader + soft sleeve**AtriumXP@gmail.com (e-mail/PayPal) I answer ref requests! Rippers, fear my Mail Fraud Form! :mad:
|
Sliver King Member
|
posted September 02, 2011 03:53 PM

Every time I check the spoiler and see a reference to spirits, I get a bad taste in my mouth. Kamigawa block really destroyed that creature type for me. I'm hoping that Innistrad will be able to repair my relationship with the ghostly beings. The Angel of Flight Alabaster is a promising start - and it's splashable for limited play. Bonus!
|
Jtrade77 Member
|
posted September 02, 2011 04:53 PM

Actually my first thought about Rooftop Storm was Lava Zombie, return itself about 300 times, cast Grapeshot or Brainfreeze, good game.Explains the 6 mana casting cost at least.
|
TimeBeing Member
|
posted September 02, 2011 05:05 PM

Shapecaster Mage looks completely sick.if you haven't seen it Snapcaster Mage Rare - 1U Creature - Human Wizard Flash When Snapcaster Mage enters the battlefield, target instant or sorcery card in your graveyard gains flashback until end of turn. The flashback cost is equal to its mana cost. 2/1 good in standard, crazy in legacy and even vintage.
|
Goaswerfraiejen Member
|
posted September 02, 2011 05:06 PM

So... this card is crazy:Snapcaster Mage 1u Creature - Human Wizard (R) Flash When Snapcaster Mage enters the battlefield, target instant or sorcery card in your graveyard gains flashback until end of turn. The flashback cost is equal to its mana cost. 2/1 Illus. Volkan Baga Witness is still better overall (since the Mage will require you to pay the mana cost on the same turn), and more flexible (since it's not limited to instants and sorceries). For flashing back Misstep, Daze (yay, double Daze!), or Snuff Out, Lightning Bolt, and Brainstorm of course, this is probably superior to Witness. It's interesting, and worth keeping an eye on. It is indeed very good. I wonder if it would be worth running in NO RUG.
EDIT: Sarnath'd. __________________ "I have heard the mermaids singing, each to each. I do not think they will sing to me." -T.S. EliotRIP Ari Legacy UGB River Rock primer. PM comments/questions. Info on grad school in Phil.
[Edited 1 times, lastly by Goaswerfraiejen on September 02, 2011]
|
junichi Moderator
|
posted September 02, 2011 05:27 PM
  
quote: Originally posted by TimeBeing: Shapecaster Mage looks completely sick.if you haven't seen it Snapcaster Mage Rare - 1U Creature - Human Wizard Flash When Snapcaster Mage enters the battlefield, target instant or sorcery card in your graveyard gains flashback until end of turn. The flashback cost is equal to its mana cost. 2/1 good in standard, crazy in legacy and even vintage.
Looks good.
__________________ MOTL Fantasy NBA 2010 ChampionGet a brain, Morans!
|
hilikuS Member
|
posted September 03, 2011 07:42 AM
  
quote: Originally posted by coasterdude84: Did I miss something? What are the new rules for Trample?
quote: Originally posted by nderdog: I assume he's referring to the rules with deathtouch and trample where you only need to assign one point of damage regardless of toughness.
Yeah.
|
Jtrade77 Member
|
posted September 03, 2011 08:14 AM

Snapcaster Mage + Ancestral Visions = three cards for free.I'd expect heavy play in decks that already use the Visions.
|
Goaswerfraiejen Member
|
posted September 03, 2011 08:30 AM

quote: Originally posted by Jtrade77: Snapcaster Mage + Ancestral Visions = three cards for free.I'd expect heavy play in decks that already use the Visions.
No, that doesn't work. It checks and replicates the mana cost, not converted mana cost. Since Visions has a non-existent mana cost, it cannot be paid (and you can't suspend it).
__________________ "I have heard the mermaids singing, each to each. I do not think they will sing to me." -T.S. EliotRIP Ari Legacy UGB River Rock primer. PM comments/questions. Info on grad school in Phil.
|
mtglover Member
|
posted September 03, 2011 08:48 AM
  
What about the alternate cost? Can you cast fow from graveyard by removing a blue card or do you need to pay 5 mana? How about phyrexian mana?
|
Goaswerfraiejen Member
|
posted September 03, 2011 09:57 AM

quote: Originally posted by mtglover: What about the alternate cost? Can you cast fow from graveyard by removing a blue card or do you need to pay 5 mana? How about phyrexian mana?
FoW: Alternate costs are not the card's mana cost, so they don't count as a flashback cost.
Phyrexian mana: Works, since the mana cost is either P or X. Incidentally, I mentioned Snuff Out earlier. I shouldn't have, since you'd have to pay 3B.
__________________ "I have heard the mermaids singing, each to each. I do not think they will sing to me." -T.S. EliotRIP Ari Legacy UGB River Rock primer. PM comments/questions. Info on grad school in Phil.
|
Bugger Member
|
posted September 03, 2011 10:02 AM

But on the other hand, any spell with a low mana cost and a prohibitive additional cost would be fantastic with the mage, no? Then again those are usually good enough for legacy anyhow...
__________________ It is a known fact that more Americans watch the television than any other appliance.
|
thror Member
|
posted September 03, 2011 12:16 PM
  
quote: Originally posted by Bugger: But on the other hand, any spell with a low mana cost and a prohibitive additional cost would be fantastic with the mage, no? Then again those are usually good enough for legacy anyhow...
Pretty sure you still have to pay the additional costs, even if you are flashing the spell back. flashback in this case is just changing where you are casting the card from. You are still casting it, so spells with 'as an additional cost to cast X' still require that. __________________ "He fights you not because you have wronged him, but because you are there."[16:17] <@BrassMan> what do you need new tech for? [16:18] <@BrassMan> gush is unrestricted [19:01] <nderEvo> you can delete yourself
|
Bugger Member
|
posted September 03, 2011 12:49 PM

quote: Originally posted by thror: Pretty sure you still have to pay the additional costs, even if you are flashing the spell back. flashback in this case is just changing where you are casting the card from. You are still casting it, so spells with 'as an additional cost to cast X' still require that.
Hurm. Nvm then. Still, 2/1s for 1c that provide card advantage are provably solid in all formats right now (azure mage in standard, bob in legacy and modern) __________________ It is a known fact that more Americans watch the television than any other appliance.
|