Author
|
Topic: The Rulings Thread part 55 - Please post ALL Rules Questions here!
|
Ajd5197 Member
|
posted February 26, 2016 03:20 PM
Does a discard as a result of reality smasher trigger a card like obstinate baloth?__________________ What profit a man if he should gain the whole world, yet thereby forfeit his very soul.
|
chaos021 Member
|
posted February 26, 2016 03:24 PM
quote: Originally posted by Ajd5197: Does a discard as a result of reality smasher trigger a card like obstinate baloth?
Yes, it works. Loxodon Smiter and Wilt-Leaf Liege also work. __________________ "Message to women worldwide: Girls....we're stupid. We don't like games. We don't know games. We can't read minds. Say it like you mean or STFU." -rockondonSale Thread
|
harbingerofthevoid Member
|
posted March 21, 2016 03:59 PM
Is it legit to take notes to a tournament eg: I play Engineered Plague, can I write down creature types used in certain decks before hand so as to know what to name?
|
chaos021 Member
|
posted March 21, 2016 04:23 PM
quote: Originally posted by harbingerofthevoid: Is it legit to take notes to a tournament eg: I play Engineered Plague, can I write down creature types used in certain decks before hand so as to know what to name?
Yes, you can. You can only look at it during sideboarding though. You could also describe enough of a card to a judge, and they'll give the oracle text for it. __________________ "Message to women worldwide: Girls....we're stupid. We don't like games. We don't know games. We can't read minds. Say it like you mean or STFU." -rockondonSale Thread
|
harbingerofthevoid Member
|
posted March 22, 2016 10:37 AM
Cool. Now something I never really thought about.I have The Rack. My opp has 1 card in hand and a Jace, TMS in play. At his upkeep The Rack deals 2 to him. I know I can redirect that at Jace but, can I redirect part of it, say 1 to him and 1 to Jace? If not, is it because The Rack now says "The Rack deals X damage to that player" instead of the original wording of "The Rack deals 1 damage to opponent for each"
|
coasterdude84 Member
|
posted March 22, 2016 02:01 PM
quote: Originally posted by harbingerofthevoid: Cool. Now something I never really thought about.I have The Rack. My opp has 1 card in hand and a Jace, TMS in play. At his upkeep The Rack deals 2 to him. I know I can redirect that at Jace but, can I redirect part of it, say 1 to him and 1 to Jace? If not, is it because The Rack now says "The Rack deals X damage to that player" instead of the original wording of "The Rack deals 1 damage to opponent for each"
No, you redirect the entire effect, so no splitting it up. The wording on the The Rack was updated, but the effect didn't change at all. The damage was always a variable amount; never X occurrences of 1 damage. The old wording was describing a calculation of the damage, not literally, "1 damage for this card, and another damage for this card, etc."
|
B-Town Member
|
posted March 31, 2016 11:08 AM
I've been out of the game for quite a while until about a year ago. I'm currently putting together an Artifact heavy/Eldrazi Commander deck. If I end up with 2 cards in play that each have an effect that reduces the casting cost of Eldrazi/Artifacts by 2 colorless mana, would that mean that the relevant spells could use both of these effects, reducing casting cost by 4 colorless mana total? Hoping my question makes sense. Thanks in advance.
|
chaos021 Member
|
posted March 31, 2016 11:11 AM
quote: Originally posted by B-Town: I've been out of the game for quite a while until about a year ago. I'm currently putting together an Artifact heavy/Eldrazi Commander deck. If I end up with 2 cards in play that each have an effect that reduces the casting cost of Eldrazi/Artifacts by 2 colorless mana, would that mean that the relevant spells could use both of these effects, reducing casting cost by 4 colorless mana total? Hoping my question makes sense. Thanks in advance.
Yes. Those types of effects are cumulative. __________________ "Message to women worldwide: Girls....we're stupid. We don't like games. We don't know games. We can't read minds. Say it like you mean or STFU." -rockondonSale Thread
|
B-Town Member
|
posted April 01, 2016 11:52 AM
Thank you!
|
superpup Member
|
posted May 16, 2016 01:40 PM
Does a Dual Faced Card flipping back to its front trigger a Deathmist Raptor's ability from the graveyard? For example, if I have a werewolf that turns back to a human, will that trigger the raptor?
[Edited 1 times, lastly by superpup on May 19, 2016]
|
aethertech Member
|
posted May 16, 2016 03:23 PM
quote: Originally posted by superpup: Does a Dual Faced Card flipping back to its front trigger a Deathmist Raptor's ability from the graveyard? For example, if I have a werewolf that turns back to a human, will that trigger the raptor?
No. Transforming is not "turning face up". Deathmist only applies to morph cards, and Illusory Mask.
|
iccarus Member
|
posted May 16, 2016 05:13 PM
quote: Originally posted by aethertech: No. Transforming is not "turning face up". Deathmist only applies to morph cards, and Illusory Mask.
And manifested creatures. Right? __________________ Wisconsin - smells like dairy air!I collect Granite Gargoyles. Send them my way.
|
aethertech Member
|
posted May 16, 2016 05:29 PM
quote: Originally posted by iccarus: And manifested creatures. Right?
Potato, potato.
|
saw2th Member
|
posted May 19, 2016 03:37 AM
May I have an explanation on how Scapeshift + Valakut interacts with Spellskite? Looking for rules text, if possible.For example: >I'm at 18 with Spellskite on board, no untapped blue lands. >Opponent Scapeshifts with 7 lands in play, fetching 6 Mountains and Valakut, targeting me with all of the Valakut Triggers. >I pay 12 life to redirect all 6 triggers from Valakut to my Spellskite. >Triggers resolve. Do they all shoot Spellskite and I survive at 6? We looked it up and in a forum, some guy claimed that two of the Valakut triggers kill Spellskite, then the rest redirect back to me. Thoughts?
[Edited 2 times, lastly by saw2th on May 19, 2016]
|
aethertech Member
|
posted May 19, 2016 07:47 AM
quote: Originally posted by saw2th: May I have an explanation on how Scapeshift + Valakut interacts with Spellskite? Looking for rules text, if possible.For example: >I'm at 18 with Spellskite on board, no untapped blue lands. >Opponent Scapeshifts with 7 lands in play, fetching 6 Mountains and Valakut, targeting me with all of the Valakut Triggers. >I pay 12 life to redirect all 6 triggers from Valakut to my Spellskite. >Triggers resolve. Do they all shoot Spellskite and I survive at 6? We looked it up and in a forum, some guy claimed that two of the Valakut triggers kill Spellskite, then the rest redirect back to me. Thoughts?
If you've got enough life to switch targets from you, to Spellskite, then it will work. The first two 'bolts' hit and kill it, then the rest of the 'bolts' that you switched the target to Spellskite will just fizzle. They don't redirect back to you.
|
harbingerofthevoid Member
|
posted October 24, 2016 09:38 AM
man, had to necro the rulings thread...less of a rule but still... Collective Brutality and the like with Escalate. What is the "proper" way of saying which modes you are choosing upon casting? I haven't played with the card IRL yet so on Cockatrice I have been "saying" 1,3 or 2,3 , etc.. when stating the modes I'm using. Also, I thought I read where the modes resolved in order as printed on the card, is that correct, eg: I can't say 3,1 in the above example. Another one just to make doubly sure. If you retrace Syphon Life, after it resolves it goes on top of your graveyard just as if it was cast from your hand, correct? __________________ NEQUAQUAM VACUUM MOTL Tools Chrome Extension
|
chaos021 Member
|
posted October 24, 2016 01:46 PM
quote: Originally posted by harbingerofthevoid: man, had to necro the rulings thread...less of a rule but still... Collective Brutality and the like with Escalate. What is the "proper" way of saying which modes you are choosing upon casting? I haven't played with the card IRL yet so on Cockatrice I have been "saying" 1,3 or 2,3 , etc.. when stating the modes I'm using. Also, I thought I read where the modes resolved in order as printed on the card, is that correct, eg: I can't say 3,1 in the above example. Another one just to make doubly sure. If you retrace Syphon Life, after it resolves it goes on top of your graveyard just as if it was cast from your hand, correct?
I would probably say "first and third mode" to be more specific, but the way you say it is fine. It just has to be clear to both players as it goes on the stack. Anything with modes, or multiple lines of possible text (such as fuse cards) are executed left-to-right and top-to-bottom. So yes, you're correct. Yes. If you retrace, that card is actually put on the stack from your graveyard and technically returns to the top of your graveyard. This only matters for Vintage and Legacy afaik.
[Edited 1 times, lastly by chaos021 on October 24, 2016]
|
daner Member
|
posted October 31, 2016 10:45 PM
what could I possibly get in return for about 20K in puca pts? Like cash wise?
|
chaos021 Member
|
posted November 01, 2016 01:27 PM
quote: Originally posted by daner: what could I possibly get in return for about 20K in puca pts? Like cash wise?
Don't know the rules regarding that. I don't think anyone does.
|
harbingerofthevoid Member
|
posted December 09, 2016 03:09 PM
RAWR!I've never played with or against Vexing Shusher. If I have him in play, I cast a spell, I pass priority. If they cast a counter I can then activate Shusher? Casting into Chalice. I cast, Chalice triggers, then activate Shusher?
|
chaos021 Member
|
posted December 09, 2016 10:49 PM
quote: Originally posted by harbingerofthevoid: RAWR!I've never played with or against Vexing Shusher. If I have him in play, I cast a spell, I pass priority. If they cast a counter I can then activate Shusher? Casting into Chalice. I cast, Chalice triggers, then activate Shusher?
Yes, on both of those. Vexing Shusher's ability still has to resolve, but, assuming it does, your spell cannot be countered. It doesn't stop Spell Queller from doing it's thing though. __________________ "Message to women worldwide: Girls....we're stupid. We don't like games. We don't know games. We can't read minds. Say it like you mean or STFU." -rockondonSale Thread
|
sys41o Member
|
posted December 30, 2016 11:27 AM
If I control 1 Soulfire Grand Master and resolve a Anger of the Gods that deals damage to 3 creatures total do I gain 9 life or just 3?
|
Pail42 Member
|
posted December 30, 2016 02:05 PM
9 you gain life equal to the total damage the spell deals
|
harbingerofthevoid Member
|
posted August 09, 2017 05:33 AM
Can't even say necro when every post is necro Engineered Plague on Merfolk Lord of Atlantis in play True-name Nemesis is cast Is it still a 3/1?
|
chaos021 Member
|
posted August 09, 2017 03:55 PM
quote: Originally posted by harbingerofthevoid: Can't even say necro when every post is necro Engineered Plague on Merfolk Lord of Atlantis in play True-name Nemesis is cast Is it still a 3/1?
Yes. __________________ "Message to women worldwide: Girls....we're stupid. We don't like games. We don't know games. We can't read minds. Say it like you mean or STFU." -rockondonSale Thread
| |